Frederick Brown v. Hedgpeth
Petitioner: Mr Frederick Brown
Respondent: Mr Hedgpeth
Case Number: 2:2012cv07126
Filed: August 17, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Jay C. Gandhi
Presiding Judge: James V. Selna
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 22, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 4 JUDGMENT by Judge James V. Selna, IT IS ADJUDGED that the above-captioned action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for the reasons set forth in the Order Denying Motion for Extension of Time to File Habeas Petition, Summarily Dismissing Action Without Prejudice, and Denying Certificate of Appealability. Related to: REQUEST for Extension of Time to File 2254 State Habeas Corpus 1 , Order Dismissing Case, 3 (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (lmh)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Frederick Brown v. Hedgpeth
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Mr Frederick Brown
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Mr Hedgpeth
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?