Henry Anthony Williams v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue et al
| Henry Anthony Williams |
| Commissioner of Internal Revenue and State of California Franchise Tax Board |
| 2:2012cv07321 |
| August 24, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Paul L. Abrams |
| Christina A. Snyder |
| Taxes |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
33
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge Christina A. Snyder RE: Plaintiff's Motion to Vacate Order from Court's Calendar to Reconsider 30 ; Plaintiff's Motion to Set Aside Opposition to Amend the Complaint as Untimely 28 . Plaintiff now asks the Court to reconsider its 5/16/2013 order, arguing that defendants' motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction was untimely, and that his pleadings should be construed liberally due to his status as a pro se litigant. The Court DENIES plaintiff's motion for reconsideration. Court Reporter: Not Present. (gk)
|
|
Filing
26
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge Christina A. Snyder RE: Defendants' Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction 21 . Defendants' motion is granted. The manifest insubstantiality of the present complaint deprives this Court of subject matter jurisdiction, so the Court therefore orders that the instant action be DISMISSED. (MD JS-6. Case Terminated) Court Reporter: Not Present. (gk)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
