Enfish LLC v. Microsoft Corporation et al
Enfish LLC |
Sage Software Inc, Jack Henry and Associates Inc, Microsoft Corporation, Intuit Inc and Fiserv Inc |
2:2012cv07360 |
August 27, 2012 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Mariana R. Pfaelzer |
Michael R. Wilner |
Patent |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 309 FINAL JUDGMENT by Judge Mariana R. Pfaelzer: The Court hereby ORDERS, ADJUDGES AND DECREES that: Pursuant to the Court's Order, final judgment against Plaintiff Enfish, LLC shall be entered in favor of each Defendant, Microsoft Corporation; Fise rv, Inc.; Intuit, Inc.; Sage Software, Inc.; and Jack Henry & Associates, Inc., as a prevailing party. Enfish's Complaint, as amended, and all of its asserted causes of action are dismissed with prejudice and Enfish shall recover nothing in this action. Defendants' respective counterclaims for a declaration that the asserted claims of the '604 and '775 patents are invalid are granted. Defendants' respective counterclaims for a declaration that each Defendant has not infr inged the '604 patent are granted as to claim 17. Except as expressly granted above, Defendants' respective counterclaims and defenses are dismissed without prejudice as moot. Defendants are entitled to recover their costs incurred in this action. (gk) |
Filing 107 PROTECTIVE ORDER by Judge Mariana R. Pfaelzer. Refer to document for details of the Court's order. 106 (pso) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.