Aida Madenian v. Department Stores National Bank et al
| Aida Madenian |
| Wells Fargo Bank NA, Nordstrom Inc, Department Stores National Bank, GE Capital Retail Bank, DB Servicing Corporate and Citibank NA |
| 2:2012cv07593 |
| September 5, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Manuel L. Real |
| Patrick J. Walsh |
| Consumer Credit |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
41
ORDER AND JUDGMENT by Judge Manuel L. Real, Related to: Order on Motion for Attorney Fees, Motion Hearing,, 39 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED THAT 1. Wells Fargo shall be awarded its reasonable attorneys fees incurred in defending this action in the amount of $3,979.00 directly against ArshakBartoumian in favor of Wells Fargo as sanctions; and 2. Arshak Bartoumian shall pay Wells Fargo $3,979.00 within ten (10) days of this Order. (pj)
|
|
Filing
34
JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL by Judge Manuel L. Real. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that: 1. Judgment is entered in favor of Defendant GE CAPITAL RETAIL BANK, and against Plaintiff AIDA MADENAIN; and 2. Plaintiff shall recover nothing in this action. (lom)
|
|
Filing
32
JUDGMENT by Judge Manuel L. Real, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that: 1. Judgment is entered in favor of WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. and against Plaintiff AIDA MADENIAN; and 2. Plaintiff shall recover nothing in this action. 30 (pj)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
