Robin G Brodie v. Board of Trustees of The California State University et al
| Robin G Brodie |
| Terri Hopson and Board of Trustees of The California State University |
| 2:2012cv07690 |
| September 7, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Dean D. Pregerson |
| Alicia G. Rosenberg |
| Civil Rights: Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
39
ORDER OF DISMISSAL by Judge Dean D. Pregerson. THE COURT having ordered the Plaintiff to amended the complaint not later than February 18, 2014, and Plaintiff having failed to respond, THE COURT ORDERS that this action be, and hereby is, dismissed without prejudice for failure to comply with the orders of the Court. The Clerk shall mail, FAX or E:mail a copy of this Order to all counsel. Case Terminated. Made JS-6., (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (cch)
|
|
Filing
38
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT CSUS MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT 32 by Judge Dean D. Pregerson: The Court allows Plaintiff leave to amend her complaint to allege additional facts that demonstrate that she is entitled to equitable tolling and/or equitable estoppel, in accordance with the Courts views as expressed in this order. Any amended complaint shall be filed by February 18, 2014. (lc). Modified on 2/3/2014. (lc).
|
|
Filing
28
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND 24 by Judge Dean D. Pregerson: The Court notes that this Order only addresses good cause, not whether Plaintiffs new Complaint will survive a motion to dismiss. Accordingly, the Court need not reach Plaintiffs tolling and administrative exhaustion arguments. (lc). Modified on 8/27/2013. (lc).
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER by Judge Dean D. Pregerson: granting 14 defendants Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiffs claims against CSU are dismissed without prejudice. Of course, her claim against Hobson remains. (lc). Modified on 12/11/2012 (lc).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
