Hector Navarro et al v. Mercedes Benz of Encino
| Reuben Castro, Kevin Malone, Hector Navarro, Anthony Pinkins and Mike Shirinian |
| Mercedes Benz of Encino |
| 2:2012cv08051 |
| September 18, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| R. Gary Klausner |
| Michael R. Wilner |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 28, 2017. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 67
ORDER ON JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE THE DISCOVERY CUT-OFF DEADLINE by Judge R. Gary Klausner, re Stipulation to Continue 66 , The deadlines and hearings originally scheduled have been rescheduled( Discovery cut-off 11/30/2017.) (bp)
|
| Filing 66 STIPULATION to Continue Discovery Cut-Off from 10/19/2017 to 11/30/2017 filed by defendant Mercedes Benz of Encino. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Todd Scherwin ISO Joint Stip, # 2 Proposed Order)(Calvert, Colin) |
| Filing 65 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Notice of Appearance 64 . The following error(s) was/were found: Incorrect event selected. Correct event to be used is: Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal G123. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (ak) |
| Filing 64 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Karl R Lindegren on behalf of Defendant Mercedes Benz of Encino (Attorney Karl R Lindegren added to party Mercedes Benz of Encino(pty:dft))(Lindegren, Karl) |
|
Filing 63
DENYING STIPULATION AND ORDER 62 by Judge R. Gary Klausner. (ah)
|
| Filing 62 Joint STIPULATION to Continue Trial from January 16, 2018 to April 16, 2018 filed by DEFENDANT Mercedes Benz of Encino. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Todd B. Scherwin ISO Joint Stipulation to Continue Trial, # 2 Proposed Order on Joint Stipulation to Continue Trial)(Attorney Todd B Scherwin added to party Mercedes Benz of Encino(pty:dft))(Scherwin, Todd) |
| Filing 61 MINUTES OF Scheduling Conference held before Judge R. Gary Klausner. Amended Pleadings due by 6/15/2017. Discovery cut-off 10/19/2017. Motions due by 11/2/2017. Pretrial Conference set for 1/2/2018 at 9:00 am. Jury Trial set for 1/16/2018 at 9:00 am. Court Reporter: Sandra MacNeil. (sw) |
|
Filing 60
ORDER RE JURY TRIAL by Judge R. Gary Klausner. Pretrial Conference set for 1/2/2018 at 9:00 am; Jury Trial set for 1/16/2018 at 9:00 am. See Order for details. (sw)
|
|
Filing 59
ORDER/REFERRAL to ADR Procedure No. 3 by Judge R. Gary Klausner. Case ordered to a private mediator based upon court order. (sw)
|
| Filing 58 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan Report ; estimated length of trial 3 weeks, filed by Defendant Mercedes Benz of Encino.. (Scherwin, Todd) |
|
Filing 57
DENYING STIPULATION AND ORDER by Judge R. Gary Klausner: re Stipulation to Stay Case 55 . (ah)
|
| Filing 56 ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery), 1 filed by Defendant Mercedes Benz of Encino.(Calvert, Colin) |
| Filing 55 STIPULATION to Stay Case filed by defendant Mercedes Benz of Encino. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order re Joint Stipulation to Stay Proceedings)(Calvert, Colin) |
|
Filing 54
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge R. Gary Klausner: This Court is in receipt of the Mandate issued by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals on January 31, 2017 53 . Defendant shall file an answer within 20 days of the date of this order. A Scheduling Conference has been placed on calendar for May 1, 2017 at 9:00 a.m. The Conference will be held pursuant to F.R.Civ.P.16(b). Trial counsel must be present and there are no telephonic appearances. Counsel are ordered to file a joint statement providing a brief factual summary of the case, including the claims being asserted. The parties are reminded of their obligations to disclose information and confer on a discovery plan not later than 21 days prior to the scheduling conference, and to file a joint statement with the Court not later than 14 days after they confer, as required by F.R.Civ.P 26 and the Local Rules of this Court. Failure to comply may lead to the imposition of sanctions. Plaintiff's counsel is directed to give notice of the scheduling conference to each party that makes an initial appearance in the action after this date. (bp)
|
| Filing 53 MANDATE of Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals filed re: USCA Memorandum/Opinion/Order, 52 , Notice of Appeal to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, 29 , CCA # 13-55323. The judgment of this Court, entered January 09, 2017, takes effect this date. This constitutes the formal mandate of this Court issued pursuant to Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. (car) |
|
Filing 52
OPINION from Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals filed re: Notice of Appeal to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, 29 filed by Mike Shirinian, Kevin Malone, Anthony Pinkins, Reuben Castro, Hector Navarro. CCA # 13-55323. AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, andREMANDED. Costs on appeal awarded to Plaintiffs-Appellants.(mat)
|
|
Filing 51
ORDER from Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals filed re: Notice of Appeal to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, 29 filed by Mike Shirinian, Kevin Malone, Anthony Pinkins, Reuben Castro, Hector Navarro. CCA # 13-55323. Appellee's Motion for Rehearing, Additional Briefing, and Oral Argument Following Supreme Court Vacature and Remand is GRANTED in part. [See document for further information] (car)
|
|
Filing 50
ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION REQUESTING A CONTINUANCE OF SCHEDULING CONFERENCE TO 2/22/2016 at 09:00 AM 49 by Judge R. Gary Klausner (lc)
|
| Filing 49 STIPULATION to Continue Scheduling Conference from 12/14/15 to April 13, 2016 (120 days) filed by defendant Mercedes Benz of Encino. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order Granting Joint Stipulation Requesting A Continuance of Scheduling Conference)(Calvert, Colin) |
| Filing 43 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: REQUEST TO SUBSTITUTE ATTORNEY Keven Steinberg in place of attorney Keith Fink, Sarah Hernandez and Keven Steinberg of Fink & Steinberg 42 , REQUEST TO SUBSTITUTE ATTORNEY Keven Steinberg in place of attorney Keith Fink, Sarah Hernandez and Keven Steinberg of Fink & Steinberg 39 , REQUEST TO SUBSTITUTE ATTORNEY Keven Steinberg in place of attorney Keith Fink, Sarah Hernandez and Keven Steinberg of Fink & Steinberg 41 , REQUEST TO SUBSTITUTE ATTORNEY Keven Steinberg in place of attorney Keith Fink, Sara Hernandez and Keven Steinberg of Fink & Steinberg 38 , REQUEST TO SUBSTITUTE ATTORNEY Keven Steinberg in place of attorney Keith Fink, Sarah Hernandez and Keven Steinberg of Fink & Steinberg 40 . The following error(s) was found: Other error(s) with document(s) are specified below: G-01 Request for Approval of Substitution of Attorney or Withdrawal of Counsel not submitted.. In response to this notice the court may order (1) an amended or correct document to be filed (2) the document stricken or (3) take other action as the court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the court directs you to do so. (bp) |
|
Filing 48
ORDER ON REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF SUBSTITUTION OF ATTOERNEY by Judge R. Gary Klausner: The Court hereby orders that the request of: Reuben Castro, Plaintiff to substitute Keven Steinberg as attorney of record instead of Keith Frank, Sarah Hernandez and Keven Steinberg of Fink & Steinberg, 42 (bp)
|
|
Filing 47
ORDER ON REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF SUBSTITUTION OF ATTORNEY by Judge R. Gary Klausner: The Court hereby orders that the request of: Mike Shirinian, Plaintiff to substitute Keven Steinberg as attorney of record instead of Keith Fink, Sarah Hernandez and Keven Steinberg of Fink & Steinberg, 39 (bp)
|
|
Filing 46
ORDER ON REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF SUBSTITUTION OF ATTORNEY by Judge R. Gary Klausner: The Court hereby orders that the request of: Anthony Pinkins, Plaintiff to substitute Keven Steinberg as attorney of record instead of Keith Fink, Sarah Hernandez and Keven Steinberg of Fink & Steinberg, 40 (bp)
|
|
Filing 45
ORDER ON REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF SUBSTITUTION OF ATTORNEY by Judge R. Gary Klausner: The Court hereby orders that the request of: Kevin Malone, Plaintiff to substitute Keven Steinberg as attorney of record instead of Keith Fink, Sarah Hernandez and Kevin Steinberg of Fink & Steinberg, 41 (bp)
|
|
Filing 44
ORDER ON REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF SUBSTITUTION OF ATTORNEY by Judge R. Gary Klausner: The Court hereby orders that the request of: Hector Navarro, Plaintiff to substitute Keven Steinberg as attorney of record instead of Keith Fink, Sarah Hernandez and Keven Steinberg of Fink & Steinberg, 38 (bp) Modified on 11/13/2015 (bp).
|
| Filing 42 REQUEST TO SUBSTITUTE ATTORNEY Keven Steinberg in place of attorney Keith Fink, Sarah Hernandez and Keven Steinberg of Fink & Steinberg filed by Plaintiff Reuben Castro. (Steinberg, Keven) |
| Filing 41 REQUEST TO SUBSTITUTE ATTORNEY Keven Steinberg in place of attorney Keith Fink, Sarah Hernandez and Keven Steinberg of Fink & Steinberg filed by Plaintiff Kevin Malone. (Steinberg, Keven) |
| Filing 40 REQUEST TO SUBSTITUTE ATTORNEY Keven Steinberg in place of attorney Keith Fink, Sarah Hernandez and Keven Steinberg of Fink & Steinberg filed by Plaintiff Anthony Pinkins. (Steinberg, Keven) |
| Filing 39 REQUEST TO SUBSTITUTE ATTORNEY Keven Steinberg in place of attorney Keith Fink, Sarah Hernandez and Keven Steinberg of Fink & Steinberg filed by PLAINTIFF Mike Shirinian. (Steinberg, Keven) |
| Filing 38 REQUEST TO SUBSTITUTE ATTORNEY Keven Steinberg in place of attorney Keith Fink, Sara Hernandez and Keven Steinberg of Fink & Steinberg filed by PLAINTIFF Hector Navarro. (Steinberg, Keven) |
|
Filing 37
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION JOINT STIPULATION REQUESTING A CONTINUANCE OF SCHEDULING CONFERENCE 36 by Judge R. Gary Klausner. Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing, Scheduling Conference currently scheduled for September 21, 2015 has been continued to December 14, 2015 at 9:00 a.m. (lom)
|
| Filing 36 STIPULATION to Continue Scheduling Conference from September 21, 2015 to January 19, 2016 filed by defendant Mercedes Benz of Encino. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order Order Granting Joint Stipulation Requesting a Continuance of Scheduling Conference)(Calvert, Colin) |
|
Filing 35
SCHEDULING NOTICE TO ALL PARTIES AND ORDER by Judge R. Gary Klausner. A scheduling conference has been placed on calendar for September 21, 2015 at 9:00 a.m. The Conference will be held pursuant to F.R.Civ. P. 16(b). Trial counsel must be present and there are no telephonic appearances. Counsel are ordered to file a joint statement providing a brief factual summary of the case, including the claims being asserted. The parties are reminded of their obligations to disclose information and confer on a discovery plan not later than 21 days prior to the scheduling conference, and to file a joint statement with the Court not later than 14 days after they confer, as required by F.R. Civ.P. 26 and the Local Rules of this Court. Failure to comply may lead to the imposition of sanctions. Plaintiffs counsel is directed to give notice of the scheduling conference to each party that makes an initial appearance in the action after this date. Not later than 5 court days prior to the Scheduling Conference, counsel are ordered to confer and electronically file (joint) Form ADR-1 (and proposed order, Form ADR 12), selecting one of the three settlement options available.THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (pso) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
|
| Filing 34 MANDATE of Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals filed re: Notice of Appeal 29 CCA # 13-55323. The judgment of the 9th Circuit Court, entered March 24, 2015, takes effect this date.This constitutes the formal mandate of the 9th CCA issued pursuant to Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.Costs are taxed against the appellee in the amount of $118.08. [See USCA OPINION 31 AFFIRMED, REVERSED AND REMANDED] (mat) |
|
Filing 33
ORDER from Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals filed re: Notice of Appeal to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, 29 filed by Mike Shirinian, Kevin Malone, Anthony Pinkins, Reuben Castro, Hector Navarro. CCA # 13-55323. Appellee's petition for rehearing en banc is DENIED. (mat)
|
|
Filing 32
ORDER from Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals filed re: Notice of Appeal to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, 29 filed by Mike Shirinian, Kevin Malone, Anthony Pinkins, Reuben Castro, Hector Navarro. CCA # 13-55323. Appellee's unopposed motion for an extension of time to May 7, 2015, to file a petition for rehearing and rehearing en banc is GRANTED. (car)
|
|
Filing 31
OPINION from Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals filed re: Notice of Appeal to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, 29 filed by Mike Shirinian, Kevin Malone, Anthony Pinkins, Reuben Castro, Hector Navarro. CCA # 13-55323. Dismissal of claims 3, 5, and 7 AFFIRMED; dismissal of claim 1 and the supplemental state-law claims REVERSED; case REMANDED. Costs on appeal awarded to Plaintiffs. [See document for all details] (mat) (Main Document 31 replaced on 11/25/2015) (mat).[Per 9th CCA][ The opinion has been corrected. 11/24/2015 Modified on 11/25/2015 (mat).
|
| Filing 30 NOTIFICATION by Circuit Court of Appellate Docket Number 13-55323, 9th CCA regarding Notice of Appeal to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, 29 as to Plaintiffs Reuben Castro, Kevin Malone, Hector Navarro, Anthony Pinkins, Mike Shirinian. (car) |
| Filing 29 NOTICE OF APPEAL to the 9th CCA filed by Plaintiffs Reuben Castro, Kevin Malone, Hector Navarro, Anthony Pinkins, Mike Shirinian. Appeal of Order on Motion to Dismiss Case, 25 (Appeal fee of $455 receipt number 0973-11715457 paid.) (Steinberg, S) |
| Filing 28 NOTICE OF ERRATA filed by Plaintiffs Reuben Castro, Kevin Malone, Hector Navarro, Anthony Pinkins, Mike Shirinian. correcting Notice (Other), 27 RE Notice of Appeal - Plaintiffs' Notice of Appeal to the United States Court of Appeal For the Ninth Circuit of Order Re: Motion to Dismiss For Failure to State a Claim Upon Which Relief Can be Granted (FRCP 12(B)(6)) (Steinberg, S) |
| Filing 27 NOTICE Notice of Appeal- Plaintiffs' Notice of Appeal to the United States Court of Appeal for the Ninth Circuit of Order Re: Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim Upon Which Relief Can be Granted (FRCP 12(B)(6) Representation Statement filed by Plaintiffs and Appellants Reuben Castro, Kevin Malone, Hector Navarro, Anthony Pinkins, Mike Shirinian. (Steinberg, S) |
|
Filing 26
MINUTES: (IN CHAMBERS) Order Re: Plaintiff's Motion for Sanctions Pursuant toFRCP 11 13 is DENIED IT IS SO ORDERED by Judge R. Gary Klausner. (ir)
|
|
Filing 25
MINUTES: (IN CHAMBERS) Order Re: Defendant's Motion to Dismiss 9 The Court GRANTS Defendant's Motion to Dismiss as to Plaintiffs' First, Third, Fifth, and Seventh claims. The Court sua sponte DISMISSES the remaining state law causes of action. As such, Plaintiffs' Complaint is dismissed in its entirety IT IS SO ORDERED by Judge R. Gary Klausner. ( MD JS-6. Case Terminated ) (ir)
|
|
Filing 24
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge R. Gary Klausner: re: MOTION for Sanctions Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 11 and Local Rule 11-9 13 . The above-referenced motion, noticed for hearing on January 14, 2013, has been taken under submission and off the motion calendar. No appearances by counsel are necessary. (rne)
|
|
Filing 23
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge R. Gary Klausner. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 3/4/2013. Scheduling Conference set for 3/11/2013 09:00 AM before Judge R. Gary Klausner. (rne)
|
|
Filing 22
(IN CHAMBERS) NOTICE TO ALL PARTIES AND ORDER by Judge R. Gary Klausner. Defendants Motion to Dismiss Case For Failure to State A Claim Upon Which Relief Can Be Granted FRCP 12(b)(6) (DE 9), noticed for hearing on January 7, 2013, has been taken under submission and off the motion calendar. No appearances by counsel are necessary. The Court will issue a ruling after full consideration of properly submitted pleadings. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY.(sw) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
|
| Filing 21 REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE in Support of Plaintiffs' Reply to Opposition to Motion for Sanctions in the Amount of $19,175.00 Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 11 and Local Rule 11-9 filed by Plaintiffs Reuben Castro, Kevin Malone, Hector Navarro, Anthony Pinkins, Mike Shirinian. (Steinberg, S) |
| Filing 20 REPLY Reply to Opposition to Motion for Sanctions MOTION for Sanctions Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 11 and Local Rule 11-9 13 ; Memorandum of Points and Authorities; Declaration of S. Keven Steinberg; Exhibit filed by Plaintiffs Reuben Castro, Kevin Malone, Hector Navarro, Anthony Pinkins, Mike Shirinian. (Steinberg, S) |
| Filing 19 REPLY in support MOTION to Dismiss Case For Failure to State A Claim Upon Which Relief Can Be Granted FRCP 12(b)(6) MOTION to Dismiss Case For Failure to State A Claim Upon Which Relief Can Be Granted FRCP 12(b)(6) 9 filed by Defendant Mercedes Benz of Encino. (Calvert, Colin) |
| Filing 18 NOTICE OF ERRATA filed by Defendant Mercedes Benz of Encino. correcting Objection/Opposition (Motion related), Objection/Opposition (Motion related) 17 (Calvert, Colin) |
| Filing 17 OPPOSITION in opposition re: MOTION to Dismiss Case For Failure to State A Claim Upon Which Relief Can Be Granted FRCP 12(b)(6) MOTION to Dismiss Case For Failure to State A Claim Upon Which Relief Can Be Granted FRCP 12(b)(6) 9 filed by Defendant Mercedes Benz of Encino. (Calvert, Colin) |
| Filing 16 OPPOSITION in opposition re: MOTION for Sanctions Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 11 and Local Rule 11-9 13 filed by Defendant Mercedes Benz of Encino. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration Colin P. Calvert in support, # 2 Declaration Todd B. Scherwin in support)(Calvert, Colin) |
| Filing 15 REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE re MOTION to Dismiss Case For Failure to State A Claim Upon Which Relief Can Be Granted FRCP 12(b)(6) MOTION to Dismiss Case For Failure to State A Claim Upon Which Relief Can Be Granted FRCP 12(b)(6) 9 "Request for Judicial Notice in Support of Plaintiffs' Opposition to Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim Upon Which Relief Can be Granted (FRCP 12(B)(6)); Exhibit" filed by Plaintiffs Reuben Castro, Kevin Malone, Hector Navarro, Anthony Pinkins, Mike Shirinian. (Steinberg, S) |
| Filing 14 to Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim Upon Which Relief Can be Granted (FRCP 12(B)(6); Memorandum of Points and Authorities; Declaration of S. Keven Steinberg; Exhibits Opposition re: MOTION to Dismiss Case For Failure to State A Claim Upon Which Relief Can Be Granted FRCP 12(b)(6) MOTION to Dismiss Case For Failure to State A Claim Upon Which Relief Can Be Granted FRCP 12(b)(6) 9 Plaintiff's Opposition to Motion filed by Plaintiffs Reuben Castro, Kevin Malone, Hector Navarro, Anthony Pinkins, Mike Shirinian. (Steinberg, S) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Sanctions Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 11 and Local Rule 11-9 filed by Plaintiffs Reuben Castro, Kevin Malone, Hector Navarro, Anthony Pinkins, Mike Shirinian. Motion set for hearing on 1/14/2013 at 09:00 AM before Judge R. Gary Klausner. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order Re Motion for Sanctions in the Amount of $19,175.00 Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 11 and Local Rule 11-9)(Steinberg, S) |
|
Filing 12
MINUTES: (IN CHAMBERS) NOTICE TO ALL PARTIES AND ORDER: On the Court's own motion, defendant Mercedes Benz of Encino's Motion to Dismiss Case 9 , filed on November 16, 2012 and noticed for hearing on December 17, 2012 at 9:00 a.m., is hereby CONTINUED TO January 7, 2013 at 9:00 a.m. IT IS SO ORDERED by Judge R. Gary Klausner. (ir)
|
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Related Case(s) filed by Defendant Mercedes Benz of Encino. Related Case(s): None (Calvert, Colin) |
| Filing 10 REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE re MOTION to Dismiss Case For Failure to State A Claim Upon Which Relief Can Be Granted FRCP 12(b)(6) MOTION to Dismiss Case For Failure to State A Claim Upon Which Relief Can Be Granted FRCP 12(b)(6) 9 filed by Defendant Mercedes Benz of Encino. (Calvert, Colin) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case For Failure to State A Claim Upon Which Relief Can Be Granted FRCP 12(b)(6) filed by Defendant Mercedes Benz of Encino. Motion set for hearing on 12/17/2012 at 09:00 AM before Judge R. Gary Klausner. (Attachments: # 1 Memorandum of Points and Authorities, # 2 Declaration of Colin P. Calvert with Exhibit A, # 3 Notice of Lodgment, # 4 Exhibit A-D to Lodgment, # 5 Exhibit E-K to Lodgment, # 6 Proposed Order)(Calvert, Colin) |
| Filing 8 of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Mercedes Benz of Encino, (Calvert, Colin) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER TO STRIKE ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENTS by Judge R. Gary Klausner: the following document(s) be STRICKEN for failure to comply with the Local Rules, General Order and/or the Courts Case Management Order: MOTION to Dismiss Case For Failure to State a Claim Upon Which Relief Can Be Granted FRCP 12(b)(6) MOTION to Dismiss Case For Failure to State a Claim Upon Which Relief Can Be Granted FRCP 12(b)(6) 5 , for the following reasons: Local Rule 7.1-1 No Certification of Interested Parties and/or no copies. (rne)
|
| Filing 6 REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE re MOTION to Dismiss Case For Failure to State a Claim Upon Which Relief Can Be Granted FRCP 12(b)(6) MOTION to Dismiss Case For Failure to State a Claim Upon Which Relief Can Be Granted FRCP 12(b)(6) 5 filed by Defendant Mercedes Benz of Encino. (Calvert, Colin) |
| Filing 5 [DOCUMENT STRICKEN] - NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case For Failure to State a Claim Upon Which Relief Can Be Granted FRCP 12(b)(6) filed by Defendant Mercedes Benz of Encino. Motion set for hearing on 12/17/2012 at 09:00 AM before Judge R. Gary Klausner. (Attachments: # 1 Memorandum, # 2 Declaration of Colin P. Calvert with Exhibit A, # 3 Notice of Lodgment, # 4 Exhibit A-D to Lodgment, # 5 Exhibit E-K to Lodgment, # 6 Proposed Order)(Calvert, Colin) Modified on 11/16/2012 (rne). |
| Filing 4 Notice of Acknowledgment of Receipt of Summons and Complaint NOTICE AND ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SERVICE of Summons and Complaint returned Executed filed by Plaintiff Hector Navarro, upon Defendant Mercedes Benz of Encino acknowledgment sent by Plaintiff on 10/25/2012, answer due 12/24/2012. Acknowledgment of Service signed by Colin P. Calvert, Attorney for Defendant. (Steinberg, S) |
|
Filing 3
STANDING ORDER by Judge R. Gary Klausner. (rne)
|
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiffs Reuben Castro, Kevin Malone, Hector Navarro, Anthony Pinkins, Mike Shirinian. (et) (mg). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Defendant Mercedes Benz of Encino. Case assigned to Judge R. Gary Klausner for all further proceedings. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge Michael R Wilner. (Filing fee $ 350 PAID.) Jury Demanded., filed by Plaintiffs Mike Shirinian, Hector Navarro, Anthony Pinkins, Kevin Malone, Reuben Castro.(et) (mg). |
| 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Discovery) 1 as to Defendant Mercedes Benz of Encino. (et) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
