Humberto Daniel Klee et al v. Nissan North America Inc et al
| Humberto Daniel Klee and David Wallak |
| Nissan Motor Company Ltd and Nissan North America Inc |
| 2:2012cv08238 |
| September 24, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Dean D. Pregerson |
| Patrick J. Walsh |
| Fraud or Truth-In-Lending |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
171
JUDGMENT by Judge A. Wallace Tashima. In accordance with the Order Granting Final Approval of Class Action Settlement and Awarding Attorneys' Fees (the "Order") 170 , signed and filed concurrently herewith, IT IS ADJUDGED that this action hereby is DISMISSED with prejudice. Costs, expenses, and fees shall be as provided in the Order. IT IS ORDERED that this Court retains jurisdiction over this action and the parties (including class members) for the purpose implementing, administering, and enforcing the Settlement and the Order. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (jre)
|
|
Filing
32
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER REGARDING CONFIDENTIAL DISCOVERY MATERIAL 29 by Magistrate Judge Patrick J. Walsh. (afe)
|
|
Filing
23
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION by Judge Dean D. Pregerson: The court orders Plaintiffs to file a brief, not to exceed five pages, by Friday, January 4, 2013 to show cause why this action should not be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction (lc). Modified on 12/17/2012 (lc). Modified on 12/17/2012 (lc).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
