Carlos Abascal v. Unknown named officers, agents and employees

Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit California Central District Carlos Abascal v. Unknown named officers, agents and employees

Carlos Abascal v. Unknown named officers, agents and employees

Plaintiff:	Carlos Abascal
Defendant:	Unknown named officers, agents and employees, Director of Central Intelligence Agency (official capacity only) and Unknown named Employees of the Government of the United States of America (official and individual capacities)
Case Number:	2:2012cv08258
Filed:	September 25, 2012
Court:	US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge:	John E. McDermott
Presiding Judge:	Christina A. Snyder
Nature of Suit:	Civil Rights: Other

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
November 20, 2012	Filing 32 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Christina A. Snyder:ORDER DISMISSING CASE.On October 2, 2012, Chief Judge George H, King issued an order denying plaintiffs motion for emergency ex parte relief and ordering plaintiff to show cause why his complaint should not be dismissed with prejudice. Dkt. No. 11. In response to this order, plaintiff filed a First Amended Complaint reciting identical factual allegations and legal theories as set forth in hisoriginal Complaint, as well as the complaints he fi led in his previous federal court actions against the same or similar defendants. Plaintiff then filed a motion for preliminary injunctive relief, but did not in any other way respond to the Courts order to show cause 24 . Defendants then moved to di smiss on November 14, 2012 30 .Plaintiffs FAC is replete with details, but devoid of any plausible legal grounds for relief, and amending his complaint again would in no way cure this fundamental deficiency. Therefore, as with plaintiffs other compl aints alleging virtually identical facts, the Court finds that plaintiff cannot possibly cure the deficiencies in his FAC to state a plausible claim for relief here. In accordance with the foregoing, the Court hereby DISMISSES this case WITH PREJUDICE. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (lc). Modified on 11/21/2012 (lc).

Date Filed

Document Text

November 20, 2012

Filing 32 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Christina A. Snyder:ORDER DISMISSING CASE.On October 2, 2012, Chief Judge George H, King issued an order denying plaintiffs motion for emergency ex parte relief and ordering plaintiff to show cause why his complaint should not be dismissed with prejudice. Dkt. No. 11. In response to this order, plaintiff filed a First Amended Complaint reciting identical factual allegations and legal theories as set forth in hisoriginal Complaint, as well as the complaints he fi led in his previous federal court actions against the same or similar defendants. Plaintiff then filed a motion for preliminary injunctive relief, but did not in any other way respond to the Courts order to show cause 24 . Defendants then moved to di smiss on November 14, 2012 30 .Plaintiffs FAC is replete with details, but devoid of any plausible legal grounds for relief, and amending his complaint again would in no way cure this fundamental deficiency. Therefore, as with plaintiffs other compl aints alleging virtually identical facts, the Court finds that plaintiff cannot possibly cure the deficiencies in his FAC to state a plausible claim for relief here. In accordance with the foregoing, the Court hereby DISMISSES this case WITH PREJUDICE. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (lc). Modified on 11/21/2012 (lc).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Carlos Abascal v. Unknown named officers, agents and employees
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Unknown named officers, agents and employees
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Director of Central Intelligence Agency (official capacity only)
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Unknown named Employees of the Government of the United States of America (official and individual capacities)
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Carlos Abascal
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?