Steven Bradley et al v. Spencer Gifts LLC et al
| John Ganey, Michael Martin, Mical Montgomery and Steven Bradley |
| Spencer Gifts LLC and T Shirt Central |
| 2:2012cv08491 |
| October 3, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Audrey B. Collins |
| Margaret A. Nagle |
| Trademark |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
13
MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Audrey B. Collins: IT IS ORDERED that plaintiffs counsel show cause in writing not later than December 14, 2012, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution as to defendants Spencer Gifts LLC, T Shirt Central. In accordance with Rule 78 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local 78-1, no oral argument will be heard on this matter unless ordered by the Court. The Order to Show C ause will stand submitted upon the filing of plaintiffs response. The Court will consider as a satisfactory response the filing of the following on or before the date shown above: -- Answer to first amended complaint by defendants Spencer Gifts LLC, T Shirt Central or plaintiff's request for entry of default; --Stipulation and Order extending time to respond to complaint. Failure to file a timely response is deemed consent to the dismissal without prejudice of the action as to the above defendants. ( Response to Order to Show Cause due by 12/14/2012.) (lw)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
