Enrique Carino v. Jesus Padilla et al
Plaintiff: Enrique Carino
Defendant: Jesus Padilla, Jose Ventura Pineda, Brenda Padilla, Larios Enterprises Inc, Rafael Antonio Larios, Felix Hilario, Mario Hilario and Does 1-10
Case Number: 2:2012cv08492
Filed: October 3, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Dolly M Gee
Referring Judge: Margaret A Nagle
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 5, 2013. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 5, 2013 Filing 35 BILL OF COSTS Deficiency Notice Filed. The following deficiency was noted on the Application to the Clerk to Tax Costs filed 6/26/2013 #33 : L.R. 54-2.2 Hearing should be noticed before the clerk's designee and not the judge. Counsel is to re-notice the corrected hearing information. This document reflects the correct entered date of 6/14/2013. However, counsel is advised to file an amended notice, using the docketing event Responses/Replies/Other Motion Related Documents - Notice of Motion, and reset the matter on calendar before the Clerk of Court. (gk)
July 5, 2013 Filing 34 BILL OF COSTS Deficiency Notice Filed. The following deficiency was noted on the Application to the Clerk to Tax Costs filed 6/26/2013 #32 : L.R. 54-2.2 Hearing should be noticed before the clerk's designee and not the judge. Counsel is to re-notice the corrected hearing information. (gk)
June 26, 2013 Filing 33 Corrected APPLICATION to the Clerk to Tax Costs against defendants Rafael Antonio Larios, Larios Enterprises Inc, Brenda Padilla, Jesus Padilla, Jose Ventura Pineda re: Default Judgment, Permanent Injunction,,,,,,,,,, #30 , filed by plaintiff Enrique Carino. Application set for hearing on 7/12/2013 at 11:00 AM before Judge Dolly M. Gee. (Eyre, Steven)
June 26, 2013 Filing 32 APPLICATION to the Clerk to Tax Costs against defendants Rafael Antonio Larios, Larios Enterprises Inc, Brenda Padilla, Jesus Padilla, Jose Ventura Pineda filed by plaintiff Enrique Carino. Application set for hearing on 7/12/2013 at 11:00 AM before Judge Dolly M. Gee. (Eyre, Steven)
June 14, 2013 Filing 31 REPORT ON THE DETERMINATION OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or Trademark. (Closing) (Attachments: #1 Default Judgment and Permanent Injunction) (gk)
June 14, 2013 Filing 30 DEFAULT JUDGMENT AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION by Judge Dolly M. Gee: Plaintiff Enrique Carino's Motion for entry of Default Judgment and Permanent Injunction #28 is granted. Default judgment is hereby entered against defendants Jose Ventura Pineda, Jesus Padilla, Brenda Padilla, Larios Enterprises, Inc., a California corporation, and Rafael Antonio Larios and in favor of plaintiff Enrique Carino on his claims for trademark infringement, trademark dilution, and commercial disparagement under the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. Section 1125, and trade name infringement and dilution under Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code Sections 14330 et seq. and 14402 et seq. Defendants Jose Ventura Pineda, Jesus Padilla, Brenda Padilla, Larios Enterprises, Inc., a California corporation, and Rafael Antonio Larios, and each of them, and their respective agents, servants, employees, and co-venturers, and all persons in active concert or participation with defendants who receive actual notice of this order by personal service or otherwise, are hereby PERMANENTLY ENJOINED re the mark "Grupo Miramar," etc. Plaintiff Enrique Carino is awarded his costs of suit in an amount to be determined by the Clerk of the Court. See document for details of injunction. ( MD JS-6. Case Terminated ) (gk)
June 14, 2013 Filing 29 MINUTES OF Motion Hearing held before Judge Dolly M. Gee: Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment #28 is GRANTED. A default judgment and permanent injunction shall be entered against Defendants Pineda, Jesus Padilla, Brenda Padilla, Larios, and Larios Enterprises, Inc. At the hearing on the motion for default judgment, pursuant to Plaintiff's oral motion, the Court dismissed, without prejudice, all claims against Defendants Felix Hilario and Mario Hilario as well as the remaining claims against all defendants for interference with prospective business advantage and an accounting. Court Reporter: Anne Kielwasser. (gk)
May 13, 2013 Filing 28 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Default Judgment against defendants Jesus Padilla, Jose Ventura Pineda, Brenda Padilla, Rafael Antonio Larios, Larios Enterprises, Inc. filed by plaintiff Enrique Carino. Motion set for hearing on 6/14/2013 at 09:30 AM before Judge Dolly M. Gee. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum of Points and Authorities, #2 Declaration of Enrique Cario, #3 Declaration of Adrian Solano, #4 Declaration of Steven J. Eyre, #5 Exhibit 1, #6 Exhibit 2, #7 Exhibit 3, #8 Exhibit 4, #9 Exhibit 5, #10 Exhibit 6, #11 Exhibit 7, #12 Exhibit 8, #13 Exhibit 9, #14 Exhibit 10, #15 Exhibit 11, #16 Exhibit 12, #17 Exhibit 13, #18 Exhibit 14, #19 Exhibit 15, #20 Exhibit 16, #21 Exhibit 17, #22 Exhibit 18, #23 Exhibit 19, #24 Exhibit 20, #25 Exhibit 21, #26 Exhibit 22, #27 Proposed Order Default Judgment and Permanent Injunction)(Eyre, Steven)
February 1, 2013 Filing 27 DEFAULT BY CLERK as to Defendant Larios Enterprises, Inc., re #23 . (gk)
February 1, 2013 Filing 26 DEFAULT BY CLERK as to Defendant Rafael Antonio Larios, re #22 . (gk)
February 1, 2013 Filing 25 DEFAULT BY CLERK as to Defendant Felix Hilario, re #21 . (gk)
February 1, 2013 Filing 24 DEFAULT BY CLERK as to Defendant Mario Hilario, re #20 . (gk)
January 3, 2013 Filing 23 REQUEST for Clerk to Enter Default against defendant Larios Enterprises Inc filed by plaintiff Enrique Carino. (Eyre, Steven)
January 3, 2013 Filing 22 REQUEST for Clerk to Enter Default against defendant Rafael Antonio Larios filed by plaintiff Enrique Carino. (Eyre, Steven)
January 3, 2013 Filing 21 REQUEST for Clerk to Enter Default against defendant Felix Hilario filed by plaintiff Enrique Carino. (Eyre, Steven)
January 3, 2013 Filing 20 REQUEST for Clerk to Enter Default against defendant Mario Hilario filed by plaintiff Enrique Carino. (Eyre, Steven)
December 19, 2012 Filing 19 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Defendant Enrique Carino, upon Defendant Larios Enterprises Inc served on 12/12/2012, answer due 1/2/2013. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Rafael Antonio Larios, Agent for Service of Process in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity. Original Summons NOT returned. (Eyre, Steven)
December 19, 2012 Filing 18 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Enrique Carino, upon Defendant Rafael Antonio Larios served on 12/12/2012, answer due 1/2/2013. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Rafael Larios in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service. Original Summons NOT returned. (Eyre, Steven)
December 11, 2012 Filing 17 DEFAULT BY CLERK as to Defendant Brenda Padilla, re #12 . (gk)
December 11, 2012 Filing 16 DEFAULT BY CLERK as to Defendant Jose Ventura Pineda, re #11 . (gk)
December 11, 2012 Filing 15 DEFAULT BY CLERK as to Defendant Jesus Padilla re #10 . (gk)
December 10, 2012 Filing 14 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Enrique Carino, upon Defendant Mario Hilario served on 12/8/2012, answer due 12/29/2012. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Mario Hilario in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service. Original Summons NOT returned. (Eyre, Steven)
December 10, 2012 Filing 13 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Enrique Carino, upon Defendant Felix Hilario served on 12/8/2012, answer due 12/29/2012. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Felix Hilario in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service. Original Summons NOT returned. (Eyre, Steven)
November 27, 2012 Filing 12 REQUEST for Clerk to Enter Default against defendant Brenda Padilla filed by plaintiff Enrique Carino. (Eyre, Steven)
November 15, 2012 Filing 11 REQUEST for Clerk to Enter Default against defendant Jose Ventura Pineda filed by plaintiff Enrique Carino. (Eyre, Steven)
November 15, 2012 Filing 10 REQUEST for Clerk to Enter Default against defendant Jesus Padilla filed by Enrique Carino Enrique Carino. (Eyre, Steven)
November 5, 2012 Filing 9 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Enrique Carino, upon Defendant Brenda Padilla served on 11/4/2012, answer due 11/25/2012. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Jesus Padilla, occupant in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by substituted service at home address and by also mailing a copy. Original Summons NOT returned. (Eyre, Steven)
October 31, 2012 Filing 8 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Enrique Carino, upon Defendant Jesus Padilla served on 10/20/2012, answer due 11/10/2012. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Jesus Padilla in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service. Original Summons NOT returned. (Eyre, Steven)
October 31, 2012 Filing 7 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Enrique Carino, upon Defendant Jose Ventura Pineda served on 10/20/2012, answer due 11/10/2012. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Jose Ventura Pineda in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service. Original Summons NOT returned. (Eyre, Steven)
October 12, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER RE TRANSFER PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 08-05 (Related Case) filed. Transfer of case declined by Judge John F. Walter, for the reasons set forth on this order. Related Case No. CV 02-07947 JFW(SSx) (rn)
October 5, 2012 ALIAS SUMMONS issued as to Defendants Jesus Padilla, Jose Ventura Pineda, Brenda Padilla, Larios Enterprises, Inc., Rafael Antonio Larios, Felix Hilario, Mario Hilario, Does 1-10. (gk)
October 5, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 5 INITIAL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Dolly M. Gee. (im)
October 3, 2012 Filing 4 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed.(ghap)
October 3, 2012 Filing 3 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION Regarding a Trademark (Initial Notification) filed by Enrique Carino. (ghap)
October 3, 2012 Filing 2 CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE Re of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Enrique Carino. (ghap) (ds).
October 3, 2012 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Defendants Does 1-10, Felix Hilario, Mario Hilario, Rafael Antonio Larios, Larios Enterprises Inc, Brenda Padilla, Jesus Padilla, Jose Ventura Pineda.Case assigned to Judge Dolly M. Gee for all further proceedings. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge Margaret A. Nagle.(Filing fee $ 350:PAID) Jury Demanded., filed by plaintiff Enrique Carino.(ghap) (ds). (Additional attachment(s) added on 10/9/2012: #1 Issued Alias Summons on Complaint) (gk).
October 3, 2012 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Discovery) #1 as to Defendants Felix Hilario, Mario Hilario, Rafael Antonio Larios, Larios Enterprises Inc, Brenda Padilla, Jesus Padilla, Jose Ventura Pineda. (ghap)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Enrique Carino v. Jesus Padilla et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Enrique Carino
Represented By: Steven J Eyre
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jesus Padilla
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jose Ventura Pineda
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Brenda Padilla
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Larios Enterprises Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Rafael Antonio Larios
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Felix Hilario
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mario Hilario
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1-10
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?