Desiree Gill v. Selene Finance LP et al
| Desiree Gill |
| Selene RMOF REO Acquisition LLC, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems Inc, SRMOF 2009 1 Trust, Selene Finance LP, Does 1 To 10, Inclusive, EquiFirst Corporation and Daniel Smith |
| 2:2012cv08665 |
| October 10, 2012 |
| U.S. District Court for the Central District of California |
| Consuelo B Marshall |
| Andrew J Wistrich |
| Real Property: Other |
| 15 U.S.C. § 1601 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 17, 2013. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 26
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS #19 by Judge Consuelo B. Marshall. The Court GRANTS Defendants' Motion to Dismiss as to Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint WITH PREJUDICE. The Court further GRANTS Defendants' RJN. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (lom)
|
| Filing 25 MINUTES OF Motion of Defendants Selene Finance, LP, Mortgage Electronics Registration Systems, Inc. (MERS) and Selene RMOF REO Acquisition, LCC to Dismiss First Amended Complaint #19 Hearing held before Judge Consuelo B. Marshall. Motion to Dismiss the First Amended Complaint is granted with prejudice. Formal order to follow. Court Reporter: Leandra Amber. (lom) |
|
Filing 24
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS: by Judge Consuelo B. Marshall. MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint for Failure to State a Claim Upon Which Relief Can Be Granted #19 is continued to May 16, 2013 at 9:00 A.M. (jl)
|
| Filing 23 NOTICE OF NON-OPPOSITION to MOTION to Dismiss Case Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint for Failure to State a Claim Upon Which Relief Can Be Granted #19 filed by Defendants Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems Inc, Selene Finance LP, Selene RMOF REO Acquisition LLC. (Withem, Michael) |
| Filing 22 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge Consuelo B. Marshall: granting #21 Plaintiff's Request for Extension of Time to File Responsive Pleading. Opposition to Motion to Dismiss #19 shall be filed on or before April 18, 2013, Reply shall be filed on or before April 25, 2013. Motion to Dismiss [ #19 is hereby continued to May 13, 2013 at 11:00 a.m. (lom) |
| Filing 21 REQUEST for Extension of Time to File Responsive Pleading pursuant to Rule 6(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure filed by Plaintiff Desiree Gill. (lom) |
| Filing 20 NOTICE OF NON-OPPOSITION to MOTION to Dismiss Case Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint for Failure to State a Claim Upon Which Relief Can Be Granted #19 filed by Defendants Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems Inc, Selene Finance LP, Selene RMOF REO Acquisition LLC. (Withem, Michael) |
| Filing 19 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint for Failure to State a Claim Upon Which Relief Can Be Granted filed by defendants Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems Inc, Selene Finance LP, Selene RMOF REO Acquisition LLC. Motion set for hearing on 4/8/2013 at 11:00 AM before Judge Consuelo B. Marshall. (Attachments: #1 Request for Judicial Notice in Support, #2 Proposed Order to Dismiss First Amended Complaint)(Withem, Michael) |
| Filing 18 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT #1 ; Request for Jury Trial against Defendants EquiFirst Corporation, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems Inc, SRMOF 2009 1 Trust, Selene Finance LP, Selene RMOF REO Acquisition LLC, Does filed by Plaintiff Desiree Gill. (lom) |
| Filing 17 MINUTES of Defendants' Motion to dismiss Plaintiff's complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted #4 held before Judge Consuelo B. Marshall. Following oral argument, the Court grants Defendants' Motion to dismiss Plaintiff's complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted #4 . The Court further grants Plaintiff's and Defendants' respective Requests for Judicial Notice. [Docket Nos. 4-1, 12.] The Court also grants Plaintiff leave to file an amended complaint no later than February 14, 2013. A Pro Se Clinic is now available for litigants representing themselves. It offers on-site information and guidance. (See attached document for details.) Court Reporter: Leandra Amber. (lom) |
| Filing 16 IN CHAMBER MINUTE ORDER/OFF THE RECORD. The Motion to Dismiss Case for Failure to State a Claim Upon Which Relief Can be Granted #4 previously scheduled for 1/22/2013 at 10:00 a.m. is being advanced on the Courts own motion. The motion is now set for hearing on 1/24/2013 at 01:30 PM before Judge Consuelo B. Marshall. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (cs) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
| Filing 15 REPLY support First MOTION to Dismiss Case for Failure to State a Claim Upon Which Relief Can be Granted #4 filed by Defendants Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems Inc, Selene Finance LP, Selene RMOF REO Acquisition LLC. (Withem, Michael) |
|
Filing 14
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS): ORDER re Ex Parte Application for TRO #11 by Judge Consuelo B. Marshall. The Application is hereby DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED. (See Order for details.) (kti)
|
| Filing 13 OPPOSITION to Defendants' MOTION to Dismiss Case #4 ; Memorandum of Points and Authorities ins support; Declaration filed by Plaintiff Desiree Gill. (lom) |
| Filing 12 REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE in support of Opposition to Dismiss case #4 ; and in support of EX PARTE APPLICATION for Temporary Restraining Order #11 ; Declaration filed by Plaintiff Desiree Gill. (lom) |
| Filing 11 EX PARTE APPLICATION for Temporary Restraining Order and Order to Show Cause re Preliminary Injunction; Memorandum of Points and Authorities in support; Declaration filed by Plaintiff Desiree Gill. Lodged [Prop] Order.(lom) |
|
Filing 9
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Consuelo B. Marshall. Defendants Selene Finance, LP, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., and Selene RMOF REO Acquisition, LLC moved to dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint on November 2, 2012 #4 . Plaintiff's Opposition was due no later than November 19, 2012. See L.R. 7-9. Plaintiff failed to timely file her Opposition #6 . Following the expiration of Plaintiff's time to file an Opposition, Plaintiff filed her Request on December 3, 2012. Plaintiff's Request seeks to extend her time for filing an Opposition until February 21, 2013. Having considered Plaintiff's Request, the Court hereby GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART the Request. Plaintiff is ORDERED to file her Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss no later than December 26, 2012. Plaintiff's Opposition should address Defendants' arguments in support of their Motion to Dismiss, in particular, Defendants arguments concerning joinder of necessary or indispensable parties. Defendants may file a Reply no later than January 9, 2013. The Court will hear argument on Defendants' Motion to Dismiss on January 22, 2013 at 10 AM. (lom)
|
|
Filing 8
SCHEDULING NOTICE IN CHAMBER MINUTE ORDER/OFF THE RECORD by Judge Consuelo B. Marshall. The Court on its own motion takes Defendants Motion to Dismiss #4 scheduled for 12/10/2012 at 11:00 a.m. off calendar and under submission, no appearances are necessary. The Court did not receive any opposition to this motion and its order will follow. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (cs) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
|
|
Filing 7
STANDING ORDER by Judge Consuelo B. Marshall. READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT CONTROLS THIS CASE AND MAY DIFFER IN SOME RESPECTS FROM THE LOCAL RULES. (im)
|
| Filing 10 REQUEST for Extension of Time to File a Responsive Pleading Pursuant to Rule 6(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure filed by Plaintiff Desiree Gill. (lom) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF NON-OPPOSITION to First MOTION to Dismiss Case for Failure to State a Claim Upon Which Relief Can be Granted #4 filed by Defendants Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems Inc, Selene Finance LP, Selene RMOF REO Acquisition LLC. (Withem, Michael) |
| Filing 5 Certification and NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendants Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems Inc, Selene Finance LP, Selene RMOF REO Acquisition LLC, (Withem, Michael) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF MOTION AND First MOTION to Dismiss Case for Failure to State a Claim Upon Which Relief Can be Granted filed by defendants Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems Inc, Selene Finance LP, Selene RMOF REO Acquisition LLC. Motion set for hearing on 12/10/2012 at 11:00 AM before Judge Consuelo B. Marshall. (Attachments: #1 Request for Judicial Notice in Support, #2 Proposed Order to Dismiss Complaint)(Withem, Michael) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER TO REASSIGN CASE due to self-recusal pursuant to General Order 08-05 by Judge Stephen V. Wilson. Case transferred from Judge Stephen V. Wilson to the calendar of Judge Consuelo B. Marshall for all further proceedings. Case number now reads as CV 12-08665 CBM(AJWx). (rn)
|
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Desiree Gill. (ghap) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Defendants Does 1 To 10 Inclusive, EquiFirst Corporation, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems Inc, SRMOF 2009 1 Trust, Selene Finance LP, Selene RMOF REO Acquisition LLC, Daniel Smith(V.P.,of Selene Finance, LP), Daniel Smith.Case assigned to Judge Stephen V. Wilson for all further proceedings. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge Andrew J. Wistrich.(Filing fee $ 350:PAID) Jury Demanded., filed by plaintiff Desiree Gill.(ghap) |
| 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Discovery) #1 as to Defendants EquiFirst Corporation, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems Inc, SRMOF 2009 1 Trust, Selene Finance LP, Selene RMOF REO Acquisition LLC, Daniel Smith(V.P.,of Selene Finance, LP), Daniel Smith. (ghap) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
