Angel Hernandez v. Paul D Brazelton

Angel Hernandez v. Paul D Brazelton

Petitioner:	Angel Hernandez
Respondent:	Paul D Brazelton
Case Number:	2:2012cv08716
Filed:	October 11, 2012
Court:	US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge:	Alicia G. Rosenberg
Presiding Judge:	George H Wu
Nature of Suit:	Habeas Corpus (General)

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
May 4, 2015	Filing 52 JUDGMENT by Judge George H. Wu, Related to: R&R - Accepting Report and Recommendations 51 . Pursuant to the Order Accepting Findings and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge, IT IS ADJUDGED that the Petition in this matter is denied and dismissed with prejudice. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (mp)
October 17, 2012	Filing 5 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg. On October 11, 2012, Petitioner, who is represented, filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. For the reasons discussed below, it appears the one-year statute of limitations has expired. The court, therefore, orders Petitioner to show cause, on or before November 13, 2012, why the court should not recommend dismissal of the petition with prejudice based on expiration of the one-year statute of limitations. (See Order for details.) (mp)

Date Filed

Document Text

May 4, 2015

Filing 52 JUDGMENT by Judge George H. Wu, Related to: R&R - Accepting Report and Recommendations 51 . Pursuant to the Order Accepting Findings and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge, IT IS ADJUDGED that the Petition in this matter is denied and dismissed with prejudice. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (mp)

October 17, 2012

Filing 5 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg. On October 11, 2012, Petitioner, who is represented, filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. For the reasons discussed below, it appears the one-year statute of limitations has expired. The court, therefore, orders Petitioner to show cause, on or before November 13, 2012, why the court should not recommend dismissal of the petition with prejudice based on expiration of the one-year statute of limitations. (See Order for details.) (mp)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Angel Hernandez v. Paul D Brazelton
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Paul D Brazelton
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Angel Hernandez
Represented By:	Jonathan Paul Milberg
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?