Diana Gail Reynolds v. Michael J Astrue

Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit California Central District Diana Gail Reynolds v. Michael J Astrue

Diana Gail Reynolds v. Michael J Astrue

Plaintiff:	Diana Gail Reynolds
Defendant:	Michael J Astrue
Case Number:	2:2012cv09179
Filed:	October 25, 2012
Court:	US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge:	Audrey B. Collins
Presiding Judge:	Jean P Rosenbluth
Nature of Suit:	Social Security: DIWC/DIWW

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
December 3, 2013	Filing 19 ORDER AWARDING EAJA FEES by Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth: Based upon the parties' Stipulation for the Award and Payment of Equal Access to Justice Act Fees, Costs, and Expenses 18 : IT IS ORDERED that fees and expenses in the amount of $ $3,900.00 as authorized by 28 U.S.C. § 2412 be awarded subject to the terms of the Stipulation. (wr)
September 6, 2013	Filing 17 JUDGMENT by Magistrate Judge Jean P Rosenbluth. It is hereby ADJUDGED AND DECREED THAT (1) Plaintiffs request for an order remanding the case for furtherproceedings is GRANTED; (2) the Commissioners request for an order affirming the Commissioners final decision and dismissing the action is DENIED; and (3) judgment is hereby entered in Plaintiffs favor. Related to: Joint Stipulation for Social Security Cases 15 . (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (twdb)

Date Filed

Document Text

December 3, 2013

Filing 19 ORDER AWARDING EAJA FEES by Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth: Based upon the parties' Stipulation for the Award and Payment of Equal Access to Justice Act Fees, Costs, and Expenses 18 : IT IS ORDERED that fees and expenses in the amount of $ $3,900.00 as authorized by 28 U.S.C. § 2412 be awarded subject to the terms of the Stipulation. (wr)

September 6, 2013

Filing 17 JUDGMENT by Magistrate Judge Jean P Rosenbluth. It is hereby ADJUDGED AND DECREED THAT (1) Plaintiffs request for an order remanding the case for furtherproceedings is GRANTED; (2) the Commissioners request for an order affirming the Commissioners final decision and dismissing the action is DENIED; and (3) judgment is hereby entered in Plaintiffs favor. Related to: Joint Stipulation for Social Security Cases 15 . (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (twdb)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Diana Gail Reynolds v. Michael J Astrue
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Michael J Astrue
Represented By:	Assistant US Attorney LA-SSA
Represented By:	Assistant US Attorney LA-CV
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Diana Gail Reynolds
Represented By:	Laura E Krank
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?