Alan Hernandez v. Allied Interstate Inc et al
| Alan Hernandez |
| Does, Allied Interstate Inc and Allied Interstate LLC |
| 2:2012cv09271 |
| October 29, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| John E. McDermott |
| Dolly M. Gee |
| Other Statutory Actions |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
59
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE by Judge Dolly M. Gee: Upon Stipulation 58 , IT IS ORDERED that this action be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, each side to bear its own costs and attorneys' fees. (gk)
|
|
Filing
31
PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott, The parties agree that disclosure and discovery activity in the above-captioned litigation may require the disclosure of documents, things, and information (collectively, Information) in the po ssession, custody, or control of Plaintiff Alan Hernandez, Defendant Allied Interstate LLC f/k/a Allied Interstate, Inc., other parties who may be added to this case at a later date, and non-parties, which may be protected under constitutional, statu tory, or common law rights to privacy, or constitute or contain trade secrets. As a result, the parties believe good cause exists to enter into a protective order to protect such Information. Without waiver of objections to the discoverability of any documents, the parties intend to provide a mechanism for the discovery of relevant Information, otherwise not objectionable, in a manner which protects all parties, including non-parties to this litigation, from the risk of disclosure of such confid ential Information. Nothing in this Order is intended, or shall be construed, to expand or restrict the scope of discoverable materials, or affect the scope of materials that may be designated as confidential and subject to any protective order, and shall not otherwise affect any persons burden or duty to comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, including but not limited to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26. re Stipulation for Protective Order 29 (SEE ORDER FOR FURTHER DETAILS) (lmh)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
