Tonisha T Robinson v. Child Protective Services et al
| Tonisha T Robinson |
| Hollywood Police Dept, Hollywood Presbyterian Hospital, LAPD, WIC, Doe Defendants and Child Protective Services |
| 2:2012cv09469 |
| November 5, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Unassigned |
| Duty Magistrate Judge |
| Civil Rights: Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
56
JUDGMENT by Judge Dale S. Fischer. IT IS HEREBY ADJUDGED that this action is dismissed without prejudice. Related to: Order 55 . (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (twdb)
|
|
Filing
46
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick. It is ordered that on or before November 8, 2013, plaintiff shall show good cause, if there is any, why proper service has not been made on defendants, Bulandus, Duarte, Chung, Horn, Frias, and Zehner within the 120-day period and why this action should not be dismissed without prejudice for lack of prosecution. See document for detailed information. (ts)
|
|
Filing
27
ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS by Judge Dale S. Fischer: (see attached) Plaintiff may either file a Third Amended Complaint which amends the false statements claim within 30 days of the date of this order or request that a summons be issued and proceed solely against defendants Bulandus, Duarte, Chung, Horn, Frias and Zehner on the claim for unlawful search. (jm)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
