DC Comics et al v. Stacey Parzik et al
| DC Comics, Disney Enterprises Inc, Hanna-Barbera Productions Inc and Sanrio Inc |
| Does and Stacey Parzik |
| 2:2012cv09507 |
| November 6, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Paul L. Abrams |
| John A Kronstadt |
| Copyright |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
18
CONSENT DECREE PURSUANT to Stipulation 17 by Judge John A. Kronstadt: Defendant and her agents, servants, employees and all persons in active concertand participation with her who receive actual notice of the injunction are hereby restrained and en joined. Each side shall bear its own fees and costs of suit. This Consent Decree shall be deemed to have been served upon Defendant at the time of its execution by the Court. The Court finds there is no just reason for delay in entering this Consent Decree and, pursuant to Rule 54(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Court directs immediate entry of this Consent Decree against Defendant. The Court shall retain jurisdiction of this action to entertain such further proceedings and to enter such further orders as may be necessary or appropriate to implement and enforce the provisions of this Consent Decree. Except as provided herein, all claims alleged in the Complaint are dismissed with prejudice. (MD JS-6. Case Terminated ) (ir)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
