Warner Bros Entertainment Inc et al v. The Global Asylum Inc
| Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios Inc, New Line Cinema LLC, New Line Productions Inc, Saul Zaentz Company and Warner Bros Entertainment Inc |
| Global Asylum Inc |
| 2:2012cv09547 |
| November 7, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Philip S. Gutierrez |
| Carla Woehrle |
| Trademark |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
103
JUDGMENT FOR PERMANENT INJUNCTION filed by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez: against Defendant Global Asylum Inc.. re: Stipulation for Entry of Judgment of Permanent Injunction entered into and filed by plaintiffs and defendant, The Global Asylum ("As ylum"), 102 THE COURT HEREBY ORDERS, ADJUDGES AND DECREES THAT: Pursuant to Rule 65 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Asylum, its respective parent, subsidiary and affiliated companies, together with its respective officers, directors , principals, owners, partners, managers, shareholders, agents, attorneys, employees, representatives, successors, assigns, transferees, and all persons acting in concert or participation with them, or at their direction, or within their control, shall be permanently enjoined and restrained from engaging in any of the following: 1. Manufacturing, producing, labeling, selling, distributing,licensing, sub-licensing, assigning, marketing, promoting, or advertising theAsylum Motion Picture in any manner that...All claims, counterclaims, and defenses in this action are hereby resolved by this Permanent Injunction Judgment. Plaintiffs and Asylum shall each bear their own attorneys' fees and costs of suit in the Action. Plaintiffs and A sylum have consented to, and the Court shall retain, continuing jurisdiction for purposes of enforcement of the Permanent Injunction Judgment. Violation of the Permanent Injunction Judgment shall expose Asylum and all other persons bound by the Judgment to all applicable penalties, including contempt of Court. (PLEASE REVIEW DOCUMENT FOR FULL AND COMPLETE DETAILS : (MD JS-6. Case Terminated) (lw)
|
|
Filing
78
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Carla Woehrle. The parties in the above-captioned case having requested that the Court issue a protective order pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(c) to protect the confidentiality of non-public and competitively sensitive information that may need to be disclosed in connection with discovery in this case, and the parties having stipulated to entry of this Order. 77 [SEE ORDER FOR FURTHER DETAILS] (gr)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
