Michael Ross v. Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC et al
| Michael Ross |
| Does, Brian Krueger, Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC, Cynthia Newman and Robert L Perry |
| 2:2012cv09687 |
| November 13, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Jacqueline Chooljian |
| Otis D Wright |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
92
JUDGMENT by Judge Beverly Reid O'Connell, in favor of Michael G Ross against Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC, Brian Krueger, Cynthia Newman, Robert L Perry Related to: REQUEST for Judgment Pursuant to FRCP 68 90 IT IS HEREBY ORDERE D AND ADJUDGED that judgment be entered pursuant to Rule 68 for Plaintiff and against Defendants in the sum of Thirty-One Thousand Dollars ($31,000.00), which is inclusive of all recoverable attorney's fees and costs.This action is dismissed in its entirety. All dates are VACATED. IT IS SO ORDERED. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (rfi)
|
|
Filing
51
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO RECONSIDER 50 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: The Court carefully and thoroughly considered each partys arguments before ruling on the remand motion, the Court DENIES Rosss Motion for Reconsideration. The Court also notes that Ross misconstrues the Courts previous Order. The Court clarifies that it did not dismiss any claims or parties in its Order denying the remand motion. The entire Second Amended Complaint remains intact. (lc). Modified on 4/18/2013. (lc).
|
|
Filing
47
ORDER by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: granting 27 Rosss Motion to Strike Affirmative Defenses is GRANTED and Defendants Answer is hereby STRICKEN with leave to amend. Defendants shall file their amended answer on or before April 16, 2013. (lc). Modified on 4/2/2013 .(lc).
|
|
Filing
43
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO REMAND 21 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II . (lc). Modified on 3/7/2013 (lc).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
