Adela Ramirez v. Hobart Corporation et al
Plaintiff: Adela Ramirez
Defendant: Does and Hobart Corporation
Case Number: 2:2012cv10023
Filed: November 21, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Audrey B. Collins
Presiding Judge: Alicia G. Rosenberg
Nature of Suit: Personal Inj. Prod. Liability

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 20, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 275 JUDGMENT ON SPECIAL VERDICT by Judge Andre Birotte Jr.: IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the plaintiffs, Adela Ramirez and Vallarta Food Enterprises, Inc., take nothing; that the action be dismissed on the merits; and that the defendant, ITW Food Equi pment Group LLC, have judgment. The defendant, ITW Food Equipment Group LLC, has agreed to waive its costs, and the plaintiffs, Adela Ramirez and Vallarta Food Enterprises, Inc., have agreed to forgo any appeal of the judgment. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (gk)
March 4, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 101 JUDGMENT GRANTING ITW FOOD EQUIPMENT GROUP'S MOTIONS IN LIMINE TO EXCLUDE PLAINTIFF'S EXPERTS AND MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT by Judge Andre Birotte, Jr.: It is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that: ITW Food Equipment Group's Motion In Lim ine to Exclude Douglas Bennett pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 702 and Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993) 75 is GRANTED. ITW Food Equipment Group's Motion In Limine to Exclude Ned Wolfe pursuant to Federal R ule of Evidence 702 and Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993) 73 is GRANTED. ITW Food Equipment Group's Motion for Summary Judgment 74 is GRANTED. As a result, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that judgment shall be entered for Defendant ITW Food Equipment Group LLC. This is a final, appealable Order. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (gk)
February 26, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 50 STIPULATED SHARING AND NON-SHARING PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg re Stipulation for Protective Order 46 . In order to preserve and maintain the confidentiality of certain confidential, commercial and/or proprietary documents and information produced or to be produced by ITW Food Equipment Group LLC ("ITW FEG")in this action, it is ordered that: SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS. ***** NOTE CHANGES MADE BY THE COURT ***** (mp)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Adela Ramirez v. Hobart Corporation et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Hobart Corporation
Represented By: Conor A McLaughlin
Represented By: David S Poole
Represented By: Samuel R W Price
Represented By: Elizabeth B Wright
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Adela Ramirez
Represented By: Frank J D'Oro, Jr
Represented By: Dennis W Ryan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?