Chao Tai Electron Co Ltd v. Ledup Enterprises Inc et al
| Chao Tai Electron Co Ltd |
| Does, Home Depot Inc, Ledup Enterprises Inc, Lowes Companies Inc and Martha Stewart Living Onmedia Inc |
| 2:2012cv10137 |
| November 28, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Manuel L. Real |
| Michael R. Wilner |
| Patent |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
76
JUDGMENT GRANTING DEFENDANT LOWES HIW, INC.S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF INVALIDITY OF THE 287 PATENT by Judge Manuel L. Real, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, JUDGED AND DECREED: 1. U.S. Patent No. 7,301,287 is anticipated by U.S. Patent No. 6,972,528and is , therefore, invalid.2. Defendants Lowes and LedUp are entitled to summary judgment ofinvalidity of U.S. Patent No. 7,301,287 as a matter of law. 3. Defendant Lowes Motion for Summary Judgment of invalidity is granted. 4. For each cause of action all eged in the First Amended Complaint of Patent Infringement, judgment is entered against Plaintiff and in favor of Defendants Lowes and LedUp, for each counterclaim of invalidity asserted by Defendants Lowes and LedUp, judgment is entered against Plaintiff and in favor of Defendants Lowes and LedUp, and Chao Tais First Amended Complaint is hereby DISMISSEDWITH PREJUDICE. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (pj)
|
|
Filing
56
STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING THE EXCHANGE OF CONFIDENTIAL MATERIALS by Judge Manuel L. Real re Stipulation for Protective Order 54 (pj)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
