Emily Hogan et al v. ADT LLC
| Emily Hogan and Pamela Rubeo |
| ADT LLC |
| 2:2012cv10558 |
| December 10, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Dolly M. Gee |
| fernando m. olguin |
| Other Statutory Actions |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
131
ORDER DISMISSING CASE by Judge Dolly M. Gee: Upon Stipulation 130 , the action is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice in its entirety, pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (gk)
|
|
Filing
129
ORDER DISMISSING CASE by Judge Dolly M. Gee. In light of the notice of settlement, filed September 8, 2014, indicating that the case has settled in its entirety, this action is placed in inactive status. By October 8, 2014 the parties shall file eit her (1) a proper stipulation and order for dismissal or judgment or (2) motion to reopen if settlement has not been consummated. Upon the failure to timely comply with this Order, this action shall be deemed dismissed as of October 9, 2014. This Court retains full jurisdiction over this action and this Order shall not prejudice any party to this action. The Final Pretrial Conference on September 23, 2014 and Jury Trial on October 21, 2014 are VACATED.Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (im)
|
|
Filing
70
PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams GOVERNING THE PRODUCTION AND EXCHANGE OF CONFIDENTIAL AND HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION 69 **Note Changes Made by the Court** (ch)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
