Bank of New York Mellon v. Peggy Gomez et al
| Bank of New York Mellon |
| 16225 Doublegrove Street La Puente California, David Alan Boucher, Does, Expedia Lending Group, Peggy Gomez and North American Title |
| 2:2012cv10622 |
| December 11, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Jacqueline Chooljian |
| Otis D Wright |
| Real Property: Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
64
RENEWAL OF JUDGMENT BY CLERK in favor of Bank of New York Mellon and against defendants Expedia Lending Group, David Alan Boucher, Peggy Gomez, jointly and severally, entered on November 15, 2013, renewed in amounts set forth: in the principal amount of $56,463.51, interest in the amount of $61,778.96, attorneys fees of $0.00, costs of $0.00 for a total judgment of $118,242.47. Related to: APPLICATION for Renewal of Judgment 60 61 62 63 . (lom)
|
|
Filing
53
JUDGMENT by Judge Beverly Reid O'Connell, in favor of Bank of New York Mellon against Expedia Lending Group, David Alan Boucher, Peggy Gomez. Plaintiff shall file a declaration, under penalty of perjury, detailing Plaintiff's damages by September 25, 2013 Defendants shall file any opposition by October 9, 2013. ANY FAILURE TO OPPOSE PLAINTIFF'S DAMAGES BY DEFENDANTS WILL RISK IMPOSITION OF COSTS AGAINST DEFENDANTS. 50 (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (rfi)
|
|
Filing
46
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Judge Beverly Reid O'Connell.Defendants are ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why this Court should not grant Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment, for the failure of defendants to file an opposition to the motion. The response to this Order to Show Cause is to be filed no later than noon on Friday, August 23, 2013. Failure to respond to this OSC will be deemed consent to the granting of the Motion for Summary Judgment on behalf of the Plaintiff.The Court further ORDERS plaintiff to service via email, facsimile and/or personal service a copy of this minute order on the defendants within 24 hours, and file the Proof of Service no later than the end of the business day on Thursday, August 22, 2013. (rfi)
|
|
Filing
23
ORDER by Judge Otis D. Wright, II DENYING Defendants Motions to Dismiss 9 , 16 . Defendants shall have 14 days to file an answer. (jp)
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE LACK OF PROSECUTION AND SERVICE OF PROCESS by Judge Otis D. Wright, II:Plaintiff is hereby ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why Peggy Gomez has not been timely served. Plaintiff has until March 16, 2013, to respond to this order, setting forth reasons why Peggy Gomez has not been timely served. Or if she has been served, Plaintiff has until March 16, 2013 to file the proof of service. No hearing will be held for either of these orders to show cause. Failure to timely respond to both orders to show cause will result in dismissal of this action. (lc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
