Roberto Villanueva v. Domingo Uribe Jr
Petitioner: Roberto Villanueva
Respondent: Domingo Uribe, Jr
Case Number: 2:2012cv10678
Filed: December 13, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Jay C. Gandhi
Presiding Judge: Dean D. Pregerson
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 17, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 31 JUDGMENT by Judge Dean D. Pregerson. IT IS ADJUDGED that the above-captioned action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE for the reasons set forth in the Magistrate Judges Report and Recommendation. Related to: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2254) 1 . (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (twdb)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Roberto Villanueva v. Domingo Uribe Jr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Domingo Uribe, Jr
Represented By: CAAG - Office of Attorney General of California
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Roberto Villanueva
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?