Mychal Andra Reed v. CSP LAC et al
Plaintiff: Mychal Andra Reed
Defendant: CDCR, CSP LAC and Chief M.D. Paulette Finander
Case Number: 2:2012cv10727
Filed: December 14, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Unassigned
Presiding Judge: Jay C. Gandhi
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 3, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 319 FINAL JUDGMENT by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr.: For the reasons set forth in the 4/22/2016 order and judgment dismissing all of Plaintiff Mychal Andra Reed's claims except his excessive force claim 63 , the 11/30/2017 order dismissing Plaintif f's damages claims against Defendant CDCR and his claims for injunctive relief 108 , the 6/6/2018 order dismissing Plaintiff's remaining claims except for his excessive force claim against Defendant Sal Uribe 126 , and the separate order entered this day dismissing Plaintiff's remaining claim with prejudice for lack of prosecution 318 , it is hereby ordered, adjudged, and decreed that Plaintiff's claims against all Defendants are DISMISSED in their entirety with prejudice. This is a Final Judgment. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (gk)
November 17, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 182 ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr for Report and Recommendation (Issued) 180 , MOTION for Summary Judgment 173 . IT IS ORDERED that Defendant Uribe's Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED; and Defendant Uribe's Request for Judicial Notice is granted as limited in the Report and Recommendation. (see document for further details) (hr)
April 22, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 63 JUDGMENT by Judge Virginia A. Phillips: For the reasons set forth in the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation and the Order Accepting Report and Recommendation 62 IT IS ADJUDGED that: 1) All of Plaintiff's claims, except for the May 17, 2012 excessive force claim, are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE and without leave to amend; 2) This action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as against Defendants CSP LAC, Chief M.D. Paulette Finander, and Lt. C. Hughes. (kh)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mychal Andra Reed v. CSP LAC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CDCR
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CSP LAC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Chief M.D. Paulette Finander
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mychal Andra Reed
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?