Alonzo J Foster v. United States of America Department of Veterans Affairs et al
Alonzo J Foster |
Brotman Medical Center, United States of America Department of Veterans Affairs, Does and Spencer L Brown |
2:2012cv10750 |
December 17, 2012 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Dolly M. Gee |
Victor B. Kenton |
Personal Inj. Med. Malpractice |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 45 ORDER DISMISSING ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE by Judge Dolly M. Gee: Upon Stipulation 44 , the action is hereby dismissed with prejudice in its entirety, with the parties to bear their own attorney's fees and costs incurred herein. (gk) |
Filing 42 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER AND NOTICE TO ALL PARTIES by Judge Dolly M. Gee 41 . In light of the notice of settlement, filed March 19, 2014, indicating that the case has settled in its entirety, this action is placed in inactive status. By April 24 , 2014, the parties shall file either (1) a proper stipulation and order for dismissal or judgment or (2) motion to reopen if settlement has not been consummated. Upon the failure to timely comply with this Order, this action shall be deemed dismissed as of April 25, 2014. This Court retains full jurisdiction over this action and this Order shall not prejudice any party to this action. All pretrial and trial dates are hereby VACATED. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (im) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.