California Expanded Metal Products Co v. Clarkwestern Dietrich Building Systems LLC et al
| California Expanded Metal Products Co |
| Clarkwestern Dietrich Building Systems LLC and James A Klein |
| 2:2012cv10791 |
| December 18, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Dean D. Pregerson |
| Michael R. Wilner |
| Contract: Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
473
ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Judge Dean D. Pregerson. IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff may file an amended complaint as set forth in the Report (see Docket # 394, 411) and that Plaintiff be permitted to conduct additional discovery related to its added claims as recommended in the Report. Report and Recommendation (Issued) 394 (vm)
|
|
Filing
327
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO DISMISS AMENDED COUNTERCLAIM 129 . ClarkWesterns Amended Counterclaim is DISMISSED, with prejudice by Judge Dean D. Pregerson . (lc). Modified on 7/1/2015 (lc).
|
|
Filing
127
ORDER RE: MOTIONS TO DISMISS {Dkt. Nos. 113, 117 by Judge Dean D. Pregerson: The Motions to Dismiss are GRANTED. CEMCO's Third Cause of Action is dismissed with prejudice. ClarkWestern's Counterclaim is dismissed with leave to amend. Any amended counterclaim shall be filed within fourteen days of the date of this order. (See document for details) (bp)
|
|
Filing
56
PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner, The Court ACCEPTS and ENTERS the parties stipulated protective order (Docket # 54) subject to the following modifications: 1. Paragraph 12 - Any party who files a redacted, publicly available d ocument will also file an unredacted copy of the document with the Court (accompanied with an appropriate request for under seal treatment pursuant to Local Rule 79). 2. Paragraph 14 - Any motion challenging a confidentiality designation of discovery materials will fully comply with the joint filing requirements of Local Rule 37. re Stipulation for Protective Order 54 (lmh)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
