Rodney Brown v. John Doe 1 et al
| Rodney Brown |
| Little, Leroy Baca, County of Los Angeles, John Doe 1 and John Doe 2 |
| 2:2013cv00154 |
| January 9, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Percy Anderson |
| Marc L. Goldman |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
24
JUDGMENT by Judge Percy Anderson, Related to: Report and Recommendation (Issued), 22 , R&R - Accepting Report and Recommendations, 23 . IT IS ADJUDGED that Judgment be entered dismissing the First Amended Complaint and entire action without prejudice. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (rh)
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Magistrate Judge Victor B. Kenton. Accordingly, on or before May 15, 2013, Plaintiff is ORDERED to show cause as to why the order granting him in forma pauperis status in this matter should not be vacated pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), and that the action dismissed without prejudice pending payment of the full filing fee of $350.00. [SEE ORDER FOR FURTHER DETAILS] (gr)
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT WITH LEAVE TO AMEND by Magistrate Judge Marc L. Goldman, re Complaint 3 : Plaintiff has until 2/28/13, to file a first amended complaint, that remedies the defects identified in this memorandum and order and complies with the requirements of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 15-2. ( See document for further details.) (rla)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
