World Gym International IP LLC v. Muscle World Gym-Forest Park GA LLC et al
| World Gym International IP LLC |
| Elisa Reece, Does and Muscle World Gym-Forest Park GA LLC |
| 2:2013cv00282 |
| January 14, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Audrey B. Collins |
| Ralph Zarefsky |
| Trademark |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
14
STIPULATED JUDGMENT AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION by Judge Audrey B. Collins. ORDERS, ADJUDGES, AND DECREES THAT: This Court has subject matter jurisdiction over this action pursuant to 15 U.S.C. 1116, 1121, 1125(a), 1125(b) and 28 U.S.C. 1338. The Court has personal jurisdiction over Defendants. Venue is proper in the Central District of California pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1391(b)92). The Court finds that Plaintiff is the owner of the trademarks and service marks for WORLD, and WORLD GYM as referenced in U.S. registration nos. 1354193, 1783000, 1791584, 1911887, 2268311 and 2499267 (collectively, the "WORLD Marks"). The Court finds that Defendants have consented to the entry of a permanent injunction pursuant to 15 U.S.C. 1051 et seg., section 43(a) of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. 1125(a) and 1125(b), to prohibit Defendants from using or infringing upon Plaintiff's trademark and service marks for the WORLD Marks. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (bp)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
