Hsiao and Montano Inc v. Bangde Zhang et al
| Hsiao and Montano Inc |
| Bangde Zhang, Guangzhou Monsck Case Factory Co Ltd, Guangzhou Hde Audio Equipment Co Ltd, Does and Guangzhou Jiska Audio Equipment Co Ltd |
| 2:2013cv00493 |
| January 23, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Victor B. Kenton |
| Otis D. Wright |
| Trademark |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
31
ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: Odysseys Motion for Default Judgment is GRANTED with respect to liability. The Court grants Odyssey statutory damages in the amount of $509,000.00, attorneys fees in the amount of $13,780.00, costs in the amount of $560.00, and permanent injunctive relief. Odyssey shall submit a proposed judgment consistent with this Order on or before July 29, 2013. (lc). Modified on 7/25/2013 .(lc).
|
|
Filing
29
ORDER REQUESTING SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: Hsiao & Montano to submit a supplemental brief (1) setting forth the basis for the Courts exercise of personal jurisdiction over Defendants; and (2) supporting the adequacy of its me thod of service over each Defendant. Hsiao & Montano should also address why it believes service under the Hague Convention was not warranted here. Hsiao & Montanos supplemental brief is due no later than May 24, 2013. (lc). Modified on 5/3/2013. (lc).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
