Jack Rottner v. Hyundai Motor America
Plaintiff: Jack Rottner
Defendant: Hyundai Motor America
Case Number: 2:2013cv00815
Filed: February 6, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Frederick F. Mumm
Presiding Judge: George H. Wu
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 14, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 40 ORDER DISMISSING CASE by Judge George H. Wu, Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (kss)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jack Rottner v. Hyundai Motor America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Hyundai Motor America
Represented By: Joseph R Ashby
Represented By: Karin Kramer
Represented By: John S Lee
Represented By: Shon Morgan
Represented By: Stephen A Swedlow
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jack Rottner
Represented By: Cathleen M Combs
Represented By: Daniel A Edelman
Represented By: Francis R Greene
Represented By: James O Latturner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?