Yohan Cross v. M. Reynoso et al
| Yohan Cross |
| J. L. Cortez, M. L. Brodie, M. Reynoso and J. Jefferson |
| 2:2013cv01080 |
| February 14, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| John E. McDermott |
| George H. King |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
28
JUDGMENT by Judge George H. King, Related to: R&R - Accepting Report and Recommendations 27 . IT IS HEREBY ADJUDGED that this action be dismissed with prejudice. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (san)
|
|
Filing
12
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL FOR FAILURE TO PAY INITIAL PARTIAL FILING FEE by Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott. Response to Order to Show Cause due by 8/5/2013. (san)
|
|
Filing
9
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT WITH LEAVE TO AMEND by Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott, The Complaint is DISMISSED WITH LEAVE TO AMEND. If Plaintiff desires to pursue this action, he is ORDERED to file a First Amended Complaint within th irty (30) days (June 13, 2013) of the date of this Order, which remedies the deficiencies discussed above. Plaintiff must name separately each individual defendant against whom he brings his claims, identify clearly the factual basis for each of his claims and the particular constitutional violation, and articulate the connection between each named defendant and each claim. re Complaint (Prisoner Civil Rights) 3 (SEE ORDER FOR FURTHER DETAILS) (lmh)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
