Gloria Swanson v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company et al
| Gloria Swanson |
| Bank of America Long-Term Disability Benefits Plan and Metropolitan Life Insurance Company |
| 2:2013cv01459 |
| February 28, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Suzanne H. Segal |
| Stephen V. Wilson |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
11
ORDER re Notice of Settlement 10 by Judge Stephen V. Wilson. IT IS ORDERED that this case is removed from this Courts active caseload without prejudice to the right, upon good cause shown within 30 days, to request a status conference be scheduled if settlement is not consummated. This Court retains jurisdiction over this action and this Order shall not prejudice any party to this action. (Case Terminated. Made JS-6.) (kti)
|
|
Filing
8
IN CHAMBERS - ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Stephen V. Wilson: The file in this case lacks the papers that would show it is being timely prosecuted, as reflected below. Accordingly, the Co urt, on its own motion, hereby orders plaintiff(s) to show cause in writing no later than May 3, 2013 why this action should not be dismissed as to all remaining defendant Metropolitan Life Insurance Company for lack of prosecution. (See document for details.) (pc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
