Theodore Shove v. Kevin Chappelle
Petitioner: Theodore Shove
Respondent: Warden Kevin Chappelle
Case Number: 2:2013cv01475
Filed: February 28, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Manuel L. Real
Nature of Suit: Death Penalty - Habeas Corpus

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 11, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 6 JUDGMENT by Judge Manuel L. Real, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that for the reasons set forth in the Order Denying and Dismissing Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is hereby DENIED and DISMISSED. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (pj)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Theodore Shove v. Kevin Chappelle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Warden Kevin Chappelle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Theodore Shove
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?