GB Inland Properties LLC v. Marlon Torres

Plaintiff: GB Inland Properties LLC
Defendant: Marlon Torres
Case Number: 2:2013cv01576
Filed: March 5, 2013
Court: California Central District Court
Presiding Judge: Unassigned
Nature of Suit: Real Property: Foreclosure

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
March 21, 2013 3 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER by Chief Judge George H. King summarily remanding improperly-removed action to Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, North District, Antelope Valley Courthouse, 42011 4th Street West, Lancaster, CA 93534; Case number 12U03079. (SEE ATTACHED ORDER) (Case Terminated, Made JS-6) (Attachments: # 1 letter to Superior Court) (esa)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: GB Inland Properties LLC v. Marlon Torres
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: GB Inland Properties LLC
Represented By: Helen G Long
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Marlon Torres
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.