Debra Cox et al v. Princess Cruise Lines Ltd et al
||Debra Cox and Ted Cox
||Does and Princess Cruise Lines Ltd
||March 12, 2013
||US District Court for the Central District of California
||Frederick F. Mumm
|Nature of Suit:
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|August 25, 2015
ORDER re: Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment 86 by Judge Ronald S.W. Lew. The Court GRANTS in part and DENIES in part Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment. Because Plaintiff's admissible evidence creates a genuine issue of material fact for each element of negligence, Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment as to Plaintiff's negligence claim is DENIED. Because Defendant is not a "person engaged in the business of selling [the ramp at issue] for use or consumption," Defendant is not subject to Plaintiff's strict product liability claim as a matter of law. The Court therefore GRANTS Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment as to Plaintiff's strict liability claim. (jre)
|June 25, 2013
ORDER RE: DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS PORTIONS OF PLAINTIFFS' COMPLAINT 8 by Judge Ronald S.W. Lew: the Court GRANTS in part and DENIES in part Defendants Motion to Dismiss Portions of Plaintiffs' Complaint. The Court GRANTS Defe ndants request to dismiss Debras claim for common carrier negligence and DENIES Defendant's request to dismiss Debra's strict liability in tort claim, Ted's loss of consortium claim, and Plaintiffs' demand for punitive damages. SEE ORDER FOR COMPLETE DETAILS. (jre)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?