Kathleen Angel Einsenberg v. Citibank NA et al
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|July 25, 2016
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge Christina A. Snyder: On 6/29/2016, plaintiff filed the instant Plaintiff's Motion for Clarification, Reconsideration, and/or Leave to Amend 93 . In this motion, plaintiff requests that the Court clarify whether it s dismissal of the FAC was with or without leave to amend. Alternatively, to the extent the Court did not grant leave to amend, plaintiff requests that the Court reconsider its ruling and grant plaintiff leave to file a Second Amended Complaint. In d ismissing the FAC, the Court intended to provide plaintiff with leave to file an amended complaint. Accordingly, the Court hereby grants plaintiff 30 days in which to file an amended complaint addressing the deficiencies identified in the Court's order dismissing the FAC. Plaintiff's motion for clarification and/or reconsideration is DENIED AS MOOT. Court Reporter: Not Present. (gk)
|June 15, 2016
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) - MOTION TO DISMISS CASE (Docket # 25 , filed May 29, 2013), APPLICATION TO REMAND (Docket # 14 , filed April 8, 2013) by Judge Christina A. Snyder: In accordance with the foregoing, defendants motion to dismiss is hereby gra nted in part and denied in part. Plaintiffs claims for rescission and plaintiffs UCL claim are hereby dismissed without prejudice. Otherwise, defendants motion is denied. Additionally, plaintiffs motion to remand the case is denied. IT IS SO ORDERED. (clee)
|April 15, 2013
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS): Proceedings: Motion to Dismiss Case 3 , filed 3/15/2013 by Judge Christina A. Snyder: plaintiff's complaint is hereby DISMISSED without prejudice. Plaintiff must file an amended complaint addressing the deficiencies identified herein by May 13, 2013. Failure to do so may result in dismissal of this action with prejudice. (jp)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?