Johnny Gonzalez Romero v. Superintendent Daniel Burns

Respondent: Superintendent Daniel Burns
Petitioner: Johnny Gonzalez Romero
Case Number: 2:2013cv02633
Filed: April 16, 2013
Court: California Central District Court
Referring Judge: Charles F. Eick
Presiding Judge: George H. Wu
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
September 1, 2016 80 Opinion or Order of the Court JUDGMENT by Judge George H. Wu. Pursuant to the Order Accepting Findings, Conclusions and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge 79 , IT IS ADJUDGED that the Petition 1 is denied and dismissed with prejudice. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (afe)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Johnny Gonzalez Romero v. Superintendent Daniel Burns
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Superintendent Daniel Burns
Represented By: Blythe J Leszkay
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Johnny Gonzalez Romero
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?