Fidelity and Guaranty Life Insurance Company v. Sheila Sharp et al
Fidelity and Guaranty Life Insurance Company |
Secri Hobdy, Brandy S Sharp, Does, Francis C Akins, Chevon Sharp, Demornay Sharp and Sheila Sharp |
2:2013cv02844 |
April 23, 2013 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Stephen J. Hillman |
Stephen V. Wilson |
Insurance |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 22 ORDER AND JUDGMENT TO SETASIDE DEFAULT, FOR DISCHARGE,DISMISSAL, DISBURSEMENT OFFUNDS, AND REIMBURSEMENT OF ATTORNEYS FEES AND COSTS by Judge Stephen V. Wilson, Related to: Stipulation to Set Aside Default 21 Defendant Francis C. Akins shall re ceive $3,800.00. Defendant Secri Hobdy, as guardian ad litem for R.S. shall receive $32,248.20; Defendant Sheila Sharp shall receive $27,179.03; Defendant Brandy S. Sharp shall receive $27,179.04; Defendant Demornay E. Sharp shal l receive $27,179.04; F&G Life is entitled to and shall receive the sum of $6,258.94 asreimbursement for its reasonable attorneys fees and costs incurred in connectionwith this interpleader action.This action is dismissed in its entirety.. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (pj) |
Filing 18 IN CHAMBERS - ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Stephen V. Wilson: The file in this case lacks the papers that would show it is being timely prosecuted, as reflected below. Accordingly, the Court, on its own motion, hereby orders plaintiff(s) to show cause in writing no later than July 16, 2013 why this action should not be dismissed as to all remaining defendants for lack of prosecution. (pc) |
Filing 6 IN CHAMBERS - ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Stephen V. Wilson: The file in this case lacks the papers that would show it is being timely prosecuted, as reflected below. Accordingly, the Court, on its own motion, hereby orders plaintiff(s) to show cause in writing no later than June 5, 2013 why this action should not be dismissed as to defendant Francis C. Akins for lack of prosecution. (pc) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.