Mad Dogg Athletics Inc v. BH North America Corporation
| Mad Dogg Athletics Inc |
| BH North America Corporation |
| BH North America Corporation |
| Mad Dogg Athletics Inc |
| 2:2013cv02904 |
| April 24, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Jay C. Gandhi |
| Christina A. Snyder |
| Patent |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
41
CONSENT JUDGMENT AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION by Judge Christina A. Snyder: It is ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that Defendant BH North America Corporation ("BH") and its related entities, affiliates, officers, directors, subsidiaries, division s, owners, agents, servants, shareholders, employees, successors, assigns, representatives, and agents of any kind, and all persons or entities acting under BH's direction or control or in active concert or participation with BH who receive actu al notice of this Order by personal service or otherwise, are hereby permanently enjoined re infringing any of Mad Dogg's U.S. Patents, and Mad Dogg's SPIN Family of Marks, etc. The parties shall bear their own attorneys' fees and costs. All remaining causes of action or claims against BH, and all remaining causes of action or counterclaims against Mad Dogg, are hereby dismissed with prejudice. See document for details. ( MD JS-6. Case Terminated ) (gk)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
