Ticketmaster LLC v. Joseph Shalom et al
| Ticketmaster LLC |
| Joseph Shalom, Max Shalam, Svetlana Mingaeva, Rodney Jordan, Joseph Hogan, Jerry Himer, Michael Fratianni, Does, Marcus Cliett, Ezra Azizo, Michael Silverman and Beng Sweet, Jr |
| 2:2013cv03035 |
| April 30, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Jacqueline Chooljian |
| Audrey B. Collins |
| Contract: Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
18
ORDER RE: PERMANENT INJUNCTION AND DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AS TO SHALOM by Judge Audrey B. Collins: NOW, THEREFORE, Ticketmaster and Shalom, through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate to and respectfully request the Court to enter a perm anent injunction and dismiss all claims against Shalom with prejudice, as follows: Shalom and all those under his direction or control or acting in concert with him, including without limitation his agents, employees, successors, and assigns, are per manently enjoined. Except as adjudicated herein, all claims asserted by Ticketmaster against Shalom shall hereby be dismissed with prejudice. Such dismissal has no effect on any claims against other defendants in this action. Ticketmaster and Shalom shall all pay their own legal fees and costs incurred in connection with this action. Ticketmaster and Shalom shall all pay their own legal fees and costs incurred in connection with this action. (see document for further details) (bm)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
