United States of America v. Robert Spenuzza
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Robert Spenuzza
Case Number: 2:2013cv03290
Filed: May 8, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Frederick F. Mumm
Presiding Judge: Fernando M. Olguin
Nature of Suit: Taxes

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 7, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Order to Show Cause (In Chambers) Re: Dismissal Re: Lack of Prosecution by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. The court, on its own motion, orders plaintiff(s) to show cause in writing on or before September 8, 2013, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. (cb)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: United States of America v. Robert Spenuzza
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: United States of America
Represented By: Valerie L Makarewicz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Robert Spenuzza
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?