United States of America v. JPMorgan Chase Bank NA

Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit California Central District United States of America v. JPMorgan Chase Bank NA

United States of America v. JPMorgan Chase Bank NA

Plaintiff:	United States of America
Defendant:	JPMorgan Chase Bank NA
Case Number:	2:2013cv03291
Filed:	May 8, 2013
Court:	US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge:	Gary A. Feess
Presiding Judge:	Ralph Zarefsky
Nature of Suit:	Taxes

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
August 28, 2014	Filing 62 JUDGMENT by Judge Gary A. Feess, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED, that1. Defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank NA is liable to the plaintiff United Statesof America in the amount $39,716.67, plus interest provided for by law accruing on such amoun t from September 9, 2009, to the date of payment of the liability; and 2. Plaintiff United States of America shall also recover costs from defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank NA in the amount of $1,274.04. RE: in favor of United States of America against JPMorgan Chase Bank NA Related to: Notice of Lodging 61 (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (lw)
August 15, 2014	Filing 59 MINUTE ORDER (In Chambers) FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW by Judge Gary A. Feess. Court finds in favor of the United States. Once the levy was served, Chase was the only party who could have precluded the dissipation of assets. It must therefore bear the burden of its delayed action. Plaintiff shall submit a proposed judgment consistent with this order no later than September 5, 2014. See document for details. (smo)

Date Filed

Document Text

August 28, 2014

Filing 62 JUDGMENT by Judge Gary A. Feess, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED, that1. Defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank NA is liable to the plaintiff United Statesof America in the amount $39,716.67, plus interest provided for by law accruing on such amoun t from September 9, 2009, to the date of payment of the liability; and 2. Plaintiff United States of America shall also recover costs from defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank NA in the amount of $1,274.04. RE: in favor of United States of America against JPMorgan Chase Bank NA Related to: Notice of Lodging 61 (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (lw)

August 15, 2014

Filing 59 MINUTE ORDER (In Chambers) FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW by Judge Gary A. Feess. Court finds in favor of the United States. Once the levy was served, Chase was the only party who could have precluded the dissipation of assets. It must therefore bear the burden of its delayed action. Plaintiff shall submit a proposed judgment consistent with this order no later than September 5, 2014. See document for details. (smo)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: United States of America v. JPMorgan Chase Bank NA
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: United States of America
Represented By:	Daniel W Layton
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: JPMorgan Chase Bank NA
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?