Taylor Toussain v. Cynthia Tampkins
Petitioner: Taylor Toussain
Respondent: Cynthia Tampkins
Case Number: 2:2013cv03405
Filed: May 13, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Paul L. Abrams
Presiding Judge: Andrew J. Guilford
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 31, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 24 JUDGMENT by Judge Andrew J. Guilford. Pursuant to the order accepting the magistrate judges report and recommendation, IT IS ADJUDGED that the petition in this matter is denied and dismissed with prejudice. 23 (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (es)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Taylor Toussain v. Cynthia Tampkins
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Taylor Toussain
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Cynthia Tampkins
Represented By: Amber Nicole Wipfler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?