MyMedicalRecords Inc v. Jardogs LLC
| MyMedicalRecords Inc |
| Jardogs LLC |
| 2:2013cv03560 |
| May 17, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Stephen J. Hillman |
| Otis D. Wright |
| Patent |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
142
ORDER DENYING SANCTIONS AGAINST PLAINTIFF by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: Pursuant to the Courts Order to show cause why Plaintiff MyMedicalRecords(MMR) should not be sanctioned in the form of attorneys fees for opposingDefendants WebMD Health Corp., WebMD Health Services Group Inc., andAllscripts Healthcare Solutions, Inc. (collectively, "Defendants") Motion forSummary Judgement of Invalidity of the 883 Patent, MMR responds that it wasfollowing the Courts Post-Markman Scheduling Order and not acting in bad faith.For the reasons discussed below, the Court finds that MMR did not act in bad faith and therefore sanctions are undeserved in this case. Accordingly, the Court finds that MMR did not act in bad faith and therefore sanctions are undeserved in this case. (SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER DETAILS) (vv)
|
|
Filing
126
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS): ORDER by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: denying 116 Motion for Attorneys Fees.; denying 123 Request to Stay Case. the Court DENIES the Defendants Motion for Attorney Fees and DENIES Plaintiffs Motion to Stay. (ECF Nos. 88, 94; Case No. 2:13-cv-03560, ECF Nos. 116, 123.) The Court Orders MMR to show cause why MMR should not be sanctioned in the form of attorney fees for opposing Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment on Invalidity of the 883 Patent. Defendants may also submit arguments for why MMR should be sanctioned. Both parties will file their responses, not to exceed five pages, simultaneously by May 8, 2015. (shb) Modified on 4/20/2015 (shb).
|
|
Filing
109
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS OF INVALIDITYOF U.S. PATENT NO. 8,301,466 95 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: the Court finds that the asserted claims of the 466 Patent are patent ineligible, and Defendants Motion for Jud gment on the Pleadings is GRANTED without leave to amend. Defendants are directed to submit a proposed judgment by January 8. 2015. All hearing dates in the above captioned cases are VACATED and all pending motions in the above captioned cases are MOOT 91 , 94 . (lc)
|
|
Filing
108
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF INVALIDITY OF U.S. PATENT NO. 8,498,883 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II, (lc). Modified on 12/22/2014. (lc).
|
|
Filing
106
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS MOTION TO STAY 83 . Defendants are advised to re-file this motion, if and when, the "CBM" is instituted by Judge Otis D. Wright, II. (lc). Modified on 12/17/2014 (lc).
|
|
Filing
84
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS 78 , 79 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II . (lc). Modified on 11/7/2014 (lc).
|
|
Filing
70
ORDER RE. TECHNOLOGY TUTORIAL by Judge Otis D. Wright, II:The technology tutorial in this action is hereby scheduled for Wednesday, June 18, 2014, at 10 a.m.the Court STRIKES the deficient statement. The parties have until Thursday, June 5, 2014, to file an Amended Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing statement. (lc). Modified on 5/28/2014 .(lc).
|
|
Filing
67
ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS ALLSCRIPTS'S SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT 59 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II. The Court DENIES Allscript's Motion to Dismiss in its entirety. (ECF No.59.) Allscripts shall file its answer to the Second Amended Complaint within 14 day. (bp)
|
|
Filing
54
ORDER by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: granting 39 Allscripts Motion to Dismiss and DISMISSES plaintiffs claims against Allscripts contained in the First Amended Complaint WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Plaintiff may file its second amended complaint within 14 days. (lc). Modified on 1/6/2014 .(lc).
|
|
Filing
29
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO AMEND 27 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II. (lc). Modified on 11/1/2013 (lc).
|
|
Filing
25
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE. FAILURE TO JOIN NECESSARY PARTY by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: MyMedicalRecords TO SHOW CAUSE by Monday, October 7, 2013, why it has not moved to add Allscripts as a defendant in its suit against Jardogs or otherwise taken actio n to consolidate both cases. MyMedicalRecords shall respond in writing; no hearing will be held. This Order will be issued in both cases. Plaintiff shall file a response, though likely identical, in eachcase. Defendants need not respond. Failure to t imely respond will result in dismissal of one or both cases for lack of prosecution.The Court also VACATES the scheduling conference currently calendared for October 7, 2013, in the Jardogs case. The Court will defer issuing a scheduling conferenceorder until after discharging this Order. (lc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: MyMedicalRecords Inc v. Jardogs LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Jardogs LLC | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: MyMedicalRecords Inc | |
| Represented By: | Edward A Klein |
| Represented By: | Randall J Sunshine |
| Represented By: | Ted S Ward |
| Represented By: | Kim Zeldin |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
