Jorge Avila v. City of Santa Monica et al
| Jorge Avila |
| Scott Matsuda, Does, City of Santa Monica, Marilyn Amiache, Scott McGowan and George Mendez |
| 2:2013cv03570 |
| May 17, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Jay C. Gandhi |
| Otis D. Wright |
| Civil Rights: Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
37
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE SETTLEMENT by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: The parties TO SHOW CAUSE, in writing, no later than Tuesday, May 20, 2014, why settlement has not been finalized. No hearing will be held on this matter. All other dates in this matter are VACATED and taken off calendar. This order to show cause will be vacated upon the filing of a stipulation to dismiss and a proposed order of dismissal. (lc)
|
|
Filing
35
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 27 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment on Avilas negligence claim is DENIED. Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment with respect to Avilas Monell claim is GRANTED. (lc) Modified on 4/7/2014 (lc).
|
|
Filing
29
ORDER RE. DEFICIENT STATEMENT OF UNDISPUTED FACTS IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 27 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: Defendants are ORDERED to file an amended STATEMENT OF UNDISPUTED FACTS with the Court no later than Friday, March 14, 2014. Further failure to comply with the Local Rules may subject the parties to sanctions within this Courts discretion. L.R. 83-7. (lc). Modified on 3/12/2014. (lc).
|
|
Filing
25
SECOND STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER ; ORDER THEREON FILED CONCURRENTLY by Magistrate Judge Jay C. Gandhi re Stipulation for Protective Order 23 . (See Order for details) [Note Chnages Made By The Court] (bem)
|
|
Filing
21
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Jay C. Gandhi. After due consideration of the STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER submitted by the parties, and good cause appearing therefore, the Court rules as follows: The terms and conditions of the STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER shall govern the limited access to, and use of, the records /documents set forth therein. (See Order for details) 20 (bem)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
