State of California Department of Toxic Substances Control v. Stardard Nickel-Chromium Plating Company et al
Plaintiff: State of California Department of Toxic Substances Control
Defendant: The Estate of Haig Dulgarian, The Estate of Dick Dulgarian, George Dulgarian, Duke Dulgarian, Douglas Dulgarian, Dean Dulgarian, Dickie Van Breene and Stardard Nickel-Chromium Plating Company
Case Number: 2:2013cv03600
Filed: May 20, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: R. Gary Klausner
Presiding Judge: Andrew J. Wistrich
Nature of Suit: Environmental Matters

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 26, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 220 CONSENT JUDGMENT BETWEEN PLAINTIFF AND DEFENDANT STANDARD NICKEL-CHROMIUM PLATING COMPANY by Judge R. Gary Klausner. (See order for details) (shb)
September 16, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 191 CONSENT DECREE by Judge R. Gary Klausner in favor of State of California Department of Toxic Substances Control against Duke Dulgarian, The Estate of Dick Dulgarian. Settling defendants shall collectively pay to Plaintiff the total sum of two hundre d fifty thousand dollars ($250,000.00), which shall include all of the costs, related to the negotiation, and approval and entry of this Consent Decree. Defendants shall provide within 30 calendar days copies of any and all records, documents, and information within their possession or control, or that of their agents, relating to (a) the ownership, operation or control of the site. (See order for further details) (shb)
August 4, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 180 CONSENT DECREE by Judge R. Gary Klausner (mg)
May 20, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 157 CONSENT JUDGMENT by Judge R. Gary Klausner in favor of State of California Department of Toxic Substances Control against Dickie Van Breene, individually and doing business as DD & Associates LLC, and Duke Dulgarian, individually and doing business as DD & Associates LLC. Settling Defendants, jointly and severally, shall pay to Plaintiff the total sum of $137,500. By no later than thirty (30) calendar days, settling defendants shall provide to Plaintiff copies of any and all records, docum ents, and information within their possession or control, or that of that agents, relating to (a) ownership, operation or control of the Site, (b) the purchase, storage, use, handling, generation, treatment, transportation, or disposal of hazardous substances in connection with the Sire; (C) releases and/or threatened groundwater, and (d) removal, remedial or response actions conducted by any person at the Site. Related to: Notice (Other), 88 . (See order for further details) (shb)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: State of California Department of Toxic Substances Control v. Stardard Nickel-Chromium Plating Company et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The Estate of Haig Dulgarian
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The Estate of Dick Dulgarian
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: George Dulgarian
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Duke Dulgarian
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Douglas Dulgarian
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dean Dulgarian
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dickie Van Breene
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Stardard Nickel-Chromium Plating Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: State of California Department of Toxic Substances Control
Represented By: Olivia Karlin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?