Kristopher D Bagley et al v. Miller and Desatnik Management Co Inc et al
| Kyle L Bagley, Kristopher D Bagley and K. V. B. |
| Charles A Dailey, Carol P Dailey, Does and Miller and Desatnik Management Co Inc |
| 2:2013cv03784 |
| May 28, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| John E. McDermott |
| Michael W. Fitzgerald |
| Civil Rights: Accommodations |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
37
ORDER AND JUDGMENT GRANTING APPROVAL OF THE MINORS COMPROMISE AND AWARD OF ATTORNEYS' FEES by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED as follows: The Motion is GRANTED. The settlement of minor Plaintiff K.V.B in t he total amount of $1,500.00, is APPROVED. The $1,500.00 total settlement for Plaintiff K.V.B shall be deposited into an interest-bearing, federally insured, blocked account at Chase Bank (see attached Order and Judgment for further details). Bond is waived. As to the settlement of the claims of the minor K.V.B., all parties bear their own attorneys' fees and costs. (jp)
|
|
Filing
32
COURT ORDER by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald. In light of the Notice of Settlement filed February 11, 2014, the Court sets a hearing on Order To Show Cause Re Dismissal for April 14, 2014 at 11:30 a.m. If the stipulated dismissal is filed prior to this date, the matter will be taken off calendar. All other dates are hereby vacated. (jloz)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
