Morris Reese v. Sprint Nextel Corporation et al
| Morris Reese |
| AT and T Mobility LLC, Cellco Partnership, Sprint Nextel Corporation, T-Mobile US Inc, TracFone Wireless Inc and United States Cellular Corporation |
| 2:2013cv03811 |
| May 29, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Paul L. Abrams |
| Otis D. Wright |
| Patent |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
142
FINAL JUDGMENT by Judge Otis D. Wright, II:1. Plaintiff Morris Reese shall take nothing; 2. Judgment is entered on behalf of all of the Defendants in this, thelead case (Sprint Nextel Corp. (2:13-cv-3811-ODW(PLAx))), as well as in thefollowing relate d cases: a. TracFone Wireless, Inc. (2:13-cv-5196-ODW(PLAx));b. Verizon Wireless Services LLC (2:13-cv-5197- ODW(PLAx)); c. AT&T Mobility II LLC (2:13-cv-5198-ODW(PLAx)); and d. T-Mobile USA (2:13-cv-5199-ODW(PLAx));3. Defendant AT&T Mobility II LLCs and T-Mobile USAs pending Motions to Amend are dismissed without prejudice (2:13-cv-5198-ODW-PLA ECF No. 49; 2:13-cv-5199-ODW-PLA, ECF No. 60); 4. The Defendants counterclaims are dismissed without prejudice; 5. All dates and deadlines are VACATED; and 6. The Clerk of the Court shall close each case pending resolution of any application for costs or fees.(MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (lc)
|
|
Filing
140
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 131 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: The Court GRANTS Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment.. The Court ORDERS the parties to file a joint status report no later than April 23, 2018, detailing what claims, if any, remain for the Court to resolve, including whether adjudication of Defendants AT&T and TMobiles pending motions to amend is necessary given the outcome of the Motion for Summary Judgment. If there are no further claims remaining, the parties shall submit a proposed final judgment for the Courts review. (lc). Modified on 4/9/2018. (lc).
|
|
Filing
93
JUDGMENT by Judge Otis D. Wright, II. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. Plaintiff Morris Reese shall take nothing; 2. Judgment for each of the Defendants in each of the following related cases: a. Sprint Nextel Corp. (2:13-cv-3811-ODW(PLAx)); b. TracFone Wir eless, Inc. (2:13-cv-5196-ODW(PLAx)); c. Verizon Wireless Services LLC (2:13-cv-5197-ODW(PLAx)); d. AT&T Mobility II LLC (2:13-cv-5198-ODW(PLAx)); and e. T-Mobile USA (2:13-cv-5199-ODW(PLAx)). 3. Defendants' counterclaims are dismissed without prejudice. 4. The Clerk of Court shall close this case. IT IS SO ORDERED. Related to: MOTION for Summary Judgment 53 ; REQUEST for Judgment 92 (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (lom)
|
|
Filing
89
ORDER by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: Court GRANTS Reeses Amended Motion for Reconsideration 84 . Reeses original Motion for Reconsideration 81 , is DENIED AS MOOT. Having reconsidered Reeses Motion in light of the Patrella the court reaffirms its original decision granting Defendants respective motions for summary judgment on the defense of laches. (lc). Modified on 7/25/2014. (lc).
|
|
Filing
76
ORDER GRANTING SPRINT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 53 . A Judgment will issue. The parties are directed to file a joint status report detailing what issues, if any, remain for this Court to resolve by Judge Otis D. Wright, II. (lc). Modified on 5/9/2014 (lc).
|
|
Filing
52
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS REQUEST FOR LEAVE TO FILE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 49 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II:All of the summary-judgment motions in the Reese Cases will be noticed for hearing on Monday, April 14, 2014, at 1:30 p.m. All briefing shall comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Central District of California's Local Rules, and all scheduling and case management orders issued by this Court. Plaintiff may file a single opposition to all of the motions, if he so chooses but the page limitations set forth by this Court and the Local Rules still apply. (lc). Modified on 3/12/2014. (lc).
|
|
Filing
42
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S REQUEST FOR LEAVE TO FILE MOTION FORSUMMARY JUDGMENT by Judge Otis D. Wright, II. The Court GRANTS T-Mobile's Request for Leave to File Motion for Summary Judgment. (CV13-5199, ECF No. 18.) The Clerk of Court is ORDERED to file this Order in the lead case, MorrisReese v. Sprint Nextel Corp., No. 13-cv-3811-ODW(PLAx), as well. (jre) (Main Document 42 replaced on 2/14/2014) (jre).
|
|
Filing
23
ORDER CONTINUING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Otis D. Wright, II. The scheduling conference in this matter, currently for 10/7/2013 (ECF No. 21 ), is hereby CONTINUED to 10/28/2013 at 1:30 PM., to coincide with the scheduling conference in the related Reese cases. The parties joint Rule 26(f) conference is therefore due no later than 10/21/2013. (jp)
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER SEVERING CASE by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: The Court hereby SEVERS and DISMISSES WITHOUT PREJUDICE all Defendants from this case, except for Sprint, the first-named Defendant.2 Should Reese desire to refile his case against the dismissed Defen dants in this district, he must file them separately and pay a separate filing fee for each case.Further, Reese is hereby ordered to file a notice of related cases under L.R. 83-1.3.3 Sprint has 14 days from the date of this order to file its answer or otherwise respond to Reeses Complaint. (lc). Modified on 7/15/2013. (lc).
|
|
Filing
8
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY DEFENDANTS SHOULD NOT BE SEVERED UNDER 35 U.S.C. § 299 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: The Court therefore ORDERS Reese to SHOW CAUSE no later than July 12, 2013, why all named Defendants but the first-named Defendant (Sprin t Nextel) should not be severed from this action as improperly joined under § 299. Each Defendant is also invited (but not required) to file a brief statement of position on § 299 misjoinder on or before July 12. In the meantime, each Defendants time to answer or otherwise respond to Reeses Complaint is hereby SUSPENDED until further notice by the Court. (lc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
