L.A. Printex Industries, Inc. v. Rainbow USA Inc. et al
| L.A. Printex Industries, Inc. |
| Franshaw, Inc., Does, Citi Trends, Inc. and Rainbow USA Inc. |
| 2:2013cv03822 |
| May 29, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Stephen J. Hillman |
| Otis D. Wright |
| Copyright |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
33
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE SETTLEMENT by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: The parties have represented that they anticipate filing a notice of dismissal shortly. Accordingly, the Court hereby ORDERS the parties to show cause, by November 12, 2013, why settlement has not been finalized. No hearing will be held. All remaining case dates are VACATED and taken off calendar. This order to show cause will be vacated upon the filing of a stipulation to dismiss and aproposed order of dismissal. (lc)
|
|
Filing
27
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE LACK OF SERVICE by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: Plaintiff is hereby ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why Franshaw has not been timely served. Plaintiff has 7 days to comply with this order; or if Franshaw has been served within the 120-day window, Plaintiff has 7 days to file the proof of service. No hearing will be held on this matter. Failure to timely respond will result in the dismissal of Franshaw from this action. (lc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
