James Earl Jennings v. United States of America et al
| James Earl Jennings |
| Patricia Gail Richardson, Does and United States of America |
| 2:2013cv03998 |
| June 4, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Jacqueline Chooljian |
| Motor Vehicle |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
8
IN CHAMBERS - ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Judge Ronald S.W. Lew. The file in this case lacks the papers that would show it is being timely prosecuted, as reflected below. Accordingly, the Court, on its own motion, hereby orders plaintiff(s) to show cause in writing no later than December 13, 2013, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. As an alternative to a written response by plaintiff(s), the Court will accept one of the following, if it is filed on or before the above d ate, as evidence that the matter is being prosecuted diligently: Defendant/s Answer/s to the Complaint or Plaintiff's Request for Entry of Default on defendants. No oral argument of this matter will be heard unless ordered by the Court. The Ord er will stand submitted upon the filing of a responsive pleading or motion on or before the date upon which a response by plaintiff(s) is due. Plaintiff is to serve notice of this Order on all remaining named parties in this action who have not appeared. (jre)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
